Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 135 (2.18 seconds)

Balammal vs Palandi Naidu And Ors. on 7 September, 1937

event, on account of a defeasible immunity or qualified privilege attaching to the alleged defamation by reason of the occasion of the publication by first ... occasions as privileged conferring immunity from liability to an action either absolutely or conditionally, and commonly known as absolute privilege and qualified privilege. Where
Madras High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 5 - Full Document

Radhakrishnan Nair vs Chathunni on 11 December, 2002

authorities about the corruption at various hospital offices and he claimed qualified privilege for his statements. The defendants 2 to 4 also filed written statement ... qualified privilege. 9. There is no claim for absolute privilege by the defendants. Their claim is only of qualified privilege. In Surendra Nath v. Rageshwari
Kerala High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

The Editor vs Vinaya N.A on 26 June, 2004

Patna High Court has considered the scope of privilege both absolute privilege and qualified privilege and also considered the question of malice and the assessment ... party, witness or advocate. Such privilege is called 'judicial privilege' and 'professional privilege'. Judicial privilege applies not only to all kinds
Kerala High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Potaraju Venkata Reddy vs Emperor on 15 March, 1912

matter of negative inference. Mr. Rosario argued that only a qualified privilege existed in connection with the occasion of judicial proceedings and that the plea ... illustrations in Section. 499 some reference to a case of qualified privilege in connection with a statement made in the course of judicial proceedings
Madras High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 11 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next