letters
dated 08.06.2013 and 12.07.2013 are covered under the
defence of qualified privilege; and
(iii) The suit is barred by limitation.
4. In reply ... which is defamatory. Such excuse
is termed privilege. Privilege is of two kinds: (i) absolute and
(ii) qualified. If the occasion is one of absolute
letters
dated 08.06.2013 and 12.07.2013 are covered under the
defence of qualified privilege; and
(iii) The suit is barred by limitation.
4. In reply ... which is defamatory. Such excuse
is termed privilege. Privilege is of two kinds: (i) absolute and
(ii) qualified. If the occasion is one of absolute
privilege.
There are exceptions for construing a particular statement is
defamatory. It is always subject to privileges laid down under
common law. 'Privilege ... absolute privilege. A statement is said to have a qualified privilege
when no action lies for it even though it is false and defamatory,
unless
defences of jurisdiction of truth, fair comment
and qualified privilege, it is to be held publications were
mala fide. In the present case also, when
proceedings are not absulutely
privileged in this court, and that a qualified
privilege in this regard cannot be claimed in
respect of such statements, unless
falls in the category
of defence of defamation i.e. absolute privilege.
17.Before dealing the said posed question or issue ... Fair and bone fide comment
iii) Privilege
18. Privilege is of two kinds(1) absolute and (2) qualified.
Absolute privilege cover cases in which complete
privileges of the university and shall cease to be
associated in any way with, or be admitted to any
privileges of, the Punjab University, Chandigarh ... conferred the degree,
diploma or any other privileges or those
Universities for which he qualifies on the
result of such examination.
10 of 48
::: Downloaded
privileges of the University and shall cease to be associated in any way with, or be admitted to, the privileges of any other University ... conferred the degree, diploma, certificate or any other privilege of that university for which he qualifies on the result of such examination
Jayshreeben Krishnalal Somani vs Central Bank Of India & 2 on 7 November, 2016
Author
right. It is privilege to vote, which privilege may be taken away. In that case, the elector would not be qualified, even if his name ... struck off, but the qualification to be an elector and the privilege to vote when in the lawful custody of the police is taken away
