Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 1371 (2.16 seconds)

Meena Fire Works vs Madurai on 19 March, 2025

that for the subsequent periods namely 2009-10 to 2011-12, the quantification was done based on averaging and on the amounts paid as coolie ... presumption and assumption of the investigation is clearly revealed from how the quantification of the demand has been done. 14.1. The quantification of the duty
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 48 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

S Kannan vs Madurai on 19 March, 2025

that for the subsequent periods namely 2009-10 to 2011-12, the quantification was done based on averaging and on the amounts paid as coolie ... presumption and assumption of the investigation is clearly revealed from how the quantification of the demand has been done. 14.1. The quantification of the duty
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 48 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

S Baskaran vs Madurai on 19 March, 2025

that for the subsequent periods namely 2009-10 to 2011-12, the quantification was done based on averaging and on the amounts paid as coolie ... presumption and assumption of the investigation is clearly revealed from how the quantification of the demand has been done. 14.1. The quantification of the duty
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 48 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Meena Fire Works Industries vs Madurai on 19 March, 2025

that for the subsequent periods namely 2009-10 to 2011-12, the quantification was done based on averaging and on the amounts paid as coolie ... presumption and assumption of the investigation is clearly revealed from how the quantification of the demand has been done. 14.1. The quantification of the duty
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 48 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

S Meenarajan vs Madurai on 19 March, 2025

that for the subsequent periods namely 2009-10 to 2011-12, the quantification was done based on averaging and on the amounts paid as coolie ... presumption and assumption of the investigation is clearly revealed from how the quantification of the demand has been done. 14.1. The quantification of the duty
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 48 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Meena Sparklers vs Madurai on 19 March, 2025

that for the subsequent periods namely 2009-10 to 2011-12, the quantification was done based on averaging and on the amounts paid as coolie ... presumption and assumption of the investigation is clearly revealed from how the quantification of the demand has been done. 14.1. The quantification of the duty
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 48 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next