Section 14B in Employees Provident Funds Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 [Entire Act]
Fund Commissioner to impose damages under Section 14-B is a quasi-judicial function. It must be exercised after notice to the defaulter and after
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 28768 (6.89 seconds)Section 1 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
independent Company Law Board to exercise such judicial and quasi-judicial functions as are presently being exercised either by the Court or the Central Government
Section 2 in The Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 [Entire Act]
time being in force, to exercise judicial or quasi-Judicial functions; (b) “District Authority” means a District Legal Services Authority constituted under section
Sandhi Mamad Kala vs State Of Gujarat on 14 September, 1972
appeal was a quasi-judicial power and the State Government was, therefore, like any other statutory authority exercising quasi-judicial functions, bound to give reasons ... judicial power or an administrative power. Is his function an administrative function or a quasi-judicial function ? There can be no doubt, in view
Union Of India And Ors vs K. K. Dhawan on 27 January, 1993
counsel for
the respondent that as the respondents was
performing judicial or quasi-judicial
functions in making the assessment orders in
question even ... judicial or quasi-judicial proceedings is not
correct. It is true that when an officer is
performing judicial or quasi-judicial
functions disciplinary proceedings regarding
Ram Avtar Sharma & Ors. Etc vs State Of Haryana And Anr. Etc on 11 April, 1985
appropriate Government
is an administrative function and not a judicial or quasi-
judicial function is beyond the pale of controversy. [692F-
H; 693A ... appropriate Government is an
administrative function and not a judicial or quasi-judicial
function is beyond the pale of controversy.
Now if the Government performs
Testeels Ltd. vs Desai (N.M.) (Conciliation Officer) ... on 5 April, 1968
administrative law. The question is whether an administrative officer discharging quasi-judicial functions is bound to give reasons in support of the order he makes ... judicial review conferred on the High Court and the Supreme Court by the Constitution that every administrative officer exercising quasi-judicial functions must make
Testeels Ltd. vs N.M. Desai And Anr. on 5 April, 1966
giving reasons is one of the essential requirements of quasi-judicial process and a quasi-judicial authority must, therefore, give reasons in support ... judicial review conferred on the High Court and the Supreme Court by the Constitution that every administrative officer exercising quasi-judicial functions must make
Section 44 in The Government Of Union Territories Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
discretion or by or under any law to exercise any judicial or quasi-judicial functions: Provided that, in case of difference of opinion between ... Administrator is required by any law to exercise any judicial or quasi-judicial functions, the decision of the Administrator thereon shall be final
Jai Vir Singh vs State Of Uttar Pradesh Through ... on 16 November, 2007
with respect to matters decided by him in exercise of judicial or quasi judicial functions? In this connection, it is necessary to point out that ... judicial or quasi-judicial proceedings is not correct. It is true that when an officer is performing judicial or quasi-judicial functions disciplinary proceedings regarding