petitioner had quoted wrong provision. According to the respondent before the trial Court, if the petitioner wants to restore ... application was filed by quoting wrong provision of law, the Court has got power to apply the correct provision. Quoting a wrong provision
representation. The Tribunal also
found that the Inspector Posts had quoted a wrong provision in the
impugned notice and referred a rule which ... Quoting a wrong provision
does not take away the jurisdiction of the authority, the exercise of
power under a wrongly mentioned provision will not render
respondent rather than petition premises. It is well settled that quoting wrong provision of law or not quoting provisions of law or not furnishing
true that the
complainant is not required to quote the provision of law and
quoting a wrong provision of law will not render the complaint ... legal advice
21
and therefore, it can be deduced that quoting a wrong
provision of law was a deliberate attempt to mislead and
misdirect
fact that merely quoting a wrong section will not render assessment order ab initio void and that such mention of a wrong section ... that Tribunal was justified in dismissing appeal of Revenue not for quoting wrong provision but, in substance, for non-compliance of a mandatory provision which
Supreme Court held that quoting of wrong provision does not take away the jurisdiction of authorities/Court, under the Act.
iii) In N.Mani ... Sangeetha Theatre and Ors. (2004) 12 SCC 278). Thus, quoting of wrong provision of Section 20 in the order of discharge of the appellant
examine any person as a court
witness, 2) mere quoting of wrong provision of law by itself is not a
valid ground to dismiss ... settled
principle of law that mere quoting of wrong provision of law by
itself is not a valid ground to dismiss the application
filed under Section 5 of the
Limitation Act, but mere quoting of wrong provision is
not a ground for rejecting the application preferred ... Mani v. Sangeetha Theatre, SCC p.
280 para9.)
Thus, quoting of wrong provision of
Section 20 in the order of discharge
of the appellant
according to the landlady, quoting of wrong provision of law would not in any
manner affect her case and in this connection, the decisions reported ... Mohammed Iqubal vs. M.Padmanabhan ] are relied upon.
No doubt, quoting of wrong provision of law by itself would not disentitle a
party to obtain
Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suit Valuation Act. Quoting wrong provisions will not be fatal to the claim of the petitioner. Taking application
