Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 153 (1.02 seconds)

Abdul vs Narcotics on 27 January, 2010

immediate superior Officer. Pursuant to such information, it was decided to conduct raid at Navsari. On 26.5.2002, during night hours, Intelligence Officer ... objection if the search is conducted by the members of the raiding party. During the course of their personal search, nothing objectionable was found
Gujarat High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 0 - R R Tripathi - Full Document

Mathurbhai vs State on 25 January, 2010

accused No.1. Panch No.2 Shri M.C. Patel and other raiding party members were instructed to follow them. After completing all formalities ... part of the panchnama was prepared recording all that had transpired. The raiding party went to Kadi in a Government vehicle and they reached Kadi
Gujarat High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - H Devani - Full Document

Vipulbhai vs State on 5 August, 2010

Devidas Chagan, Rajesh Bhiman, Hitesh Dilipsinh and Vanabhai to join in the raiding party. Thereafter, services of two panchas namely Mahendra Manilal Patel and Dhirubhai ... were asked about their willingness to join them as member of the raiding party. On showing their willingness, the first part of the panchnama
Gujarat High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - A M Kapadia - Full Document

Sulochnaben vs State on 7 May, 2010

said auto rickshaw did not stop and rushed ahead consciously that raiding party was trying to stop the rickshaw. After escaping journey of the rickshaw ... chasing by the raiding party, ultimately, rickshaw was stopped near the house of accused No.4 and driver and the accused No.4 abandoned
Gujarat High Court Cites 44 - Cited by 0 - J Patel - Full Document

Parimal vs State on 30 August, 2010

case of the prosecution that on 24.5.2001 a raid was carried out by the Deputy Engineer and other officers of Gujarat Electricity Board (for short ... Engineer, and other officers of GEB who were members of the raiding party and the panch witnesses who have turned hostile. 2.3 After recording
Gujarat High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - R H Shukla - Full Document

Jayesh vs State on 26 October, 2010

Sarvaiya is the admission of Mr. Sarvaiya i.e. the Raiding Officer and the accused has brought on record that on relevant date the panch ... hands and would catch hold the same even after the entry of raiding officer Mr. Sarvaiya and others. Mostly, he could have thrown the muddamal
Gujarat High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Harilal vs State on 3 December, 2010

Thereafter, the preliminary panchnama was drawn. Thereafter, after completing necessary procedure the raiding party reached the place in private vehicle. The complainant and first panch ... proceeded towards Sales Tax Office and rest of the members of raiding party followed them. The complainant met the Advocate Shri Raichura and Kishorbhai Bavanji
Gujarat High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Z K Saiyed - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next