Section 9A in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Defence Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules or the Indian Railway Establishment Code or any other rules or regulations that may be notified in this
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 9908 (0.04 seconds)Chairman, Railway Board And Ors vs C.R. Rangadhamaiah And Ors. Etc. Etc on 25 July, 1997
order of the Railway
Board dated March 22, 1976 was quashed on the ground that under the Indian
Railway Establishment Code which contains the statutory ... rules made
by the Railway Board in the exercise of its power under Rule 157 of the
Indian Railway Establishment Code and had the effect
Section 13B in The Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 [Entire Act]
certain industrial establishments.—
Nothing in this Act shall apply to an industrial establishment in so far as the workmen employed therein are persons to whom ... Defence Service (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules or the Indian Railway Establishment Code or any other rules or regulations as may be notified in this
Katyani Dayal And Ors vs Union Of India And Ors on 26 March, 1980
Railway
Service, namely, the Indian Railway Service of Engineers
Class I. [165 F-G]
(4) The note below Rule 106 of the Railway
Establishment Code ... Railway Board had no authority to create an
unclassified service, as it were, outside the provisions of
the Indian Railway Establishment Code. Notwithstanding the
requisitions
Ram Rajiv & Ors. vs Uoi & Ors. on 9 July, 2013
Indian Railways Establishment Manual unless a
seniority list could be drawn up as per Rule 320 of the Railway
Establishment Code the names ... Indian
Railways Establishment Manual. If seniority lists contemplated by Rule
320 of the Railway Establishment Code cannot be drawn up the select
panels have
Kundan Lal vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr. on 4 September, 1960
Area who was holding the enquiry under the provisions of the Railway Establishment Code to which the appellant was subject, found the appellant ... railway on account of his negligence.
It was urged that the orders of the Enquiring Officer under the Railway Establishment Code had become final
Divisional Superintendent, Northern ... vs R.B. Hanifi on 4 May, 1976
Manager, Northern Railway by an order dated the December, 1960 in terms of Rule 149(3) of the Indian Railway Establishment Code. Volume 1, with ... pertinent to be noticed, namely, (i) the Rule 149(3) of Railway Establishment Code was declared ultra virus by the Supreme Court in its decision
Priya Gupta vs General Manager, North Eastern ... on 11 September, 1958
railway servant enters into a service agreement at the time of entering the railway service Rule 148 of the Railway Establishment Code, either the whole ... services of a railway servant have been terminated under Rule 3 of Security Rules, or Rule 148 of Railway Establishment Code would the provisions
Jagdish Singh vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 31 January, 1975
principles that govern seniority of civil servants including railway servants.
6. The Indian Railway Establishment Code Volume I was made by the President exercise ... Establishment,
Railway Board.
9. Annexure R/4 is a letter from the Deputy Director, Establishment, Railway Board, to all the General Manager. Indian Railways
Gangadhar Gurusiddappa vs Union Of India (Uoi) on 29 June, 1962
Railway servant under Rule 143, the Railway Authorities were still competent to terminate his services under Rule 148(3) of the Railway Establishment Code ... held that the Railway Authorities were competent to take action under Rule 148 of the Railway Establishment Code, yet the terms of the notice issued