entitled to any relief. Attention to Rule 732 of Indian Railway Establishment Code 1971 was drawn which provide that a railway servant who remained absent ... Deka v. The General Manager, North East Frontier Railway, . While Rule 732 of Railway Establishment Code was not the subject-matter of the said decision
protected in terms of Rule 1313 (a) (ii) of the
Indian Railway Establishment Code Vol.II.
12. It is the case of the Railway Administration ... Court to the decision of
the Railway Ministry under rule 226 of the Railway Establishment Code. On the
side of the applicant it was argued
protected in terms of Rule 1313 (a) (ii) of the Indian Railway Establishment Code Vol.II.
12. It is the case of the Railway Administration ... Court to the decision of the Railway Ministry under rule 226 of the Railway Establishment Code. On the side of the applicant it was argued
Defence Services
(Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules or
the Indian Railway Establishment Code or any
other rules or regulations that may be
notified in this
definition of `temporary railway servant' given in Indian Railway Establishment Manual, Vol.1 (Revised Edition), 1989, Railway Administration made change and included `casual labour with ... Apex Court decision in Inder Pal Yadav case (supra). Under Indian Railway Establishment Code, Volume 1, Fifth Edition - 1985, definition of `the railway servant
assumed that
Codal Conditions, especially Rule 1316 of the Indian Railway
Establishment Code (for short "the Code"), applied to persons similarly
situated
Fundamental Rules corresponds to Rule 1342 of the Indian Railway Establishment Code Vol. II ('Railway Code' for short). As we are concerned with
time, was working as Ticket Collector at Mughalsarai Junction of East Central Railway. While working as Ticket Collector at Mughalsarai, the applicant was transferred from ... violation of statutory provisions of Rule 226 of Indian Railway Establishment Code which provides that inter-Division transfer can be ordered by the General Manager
should ordinarily be retained" in Rule 2046(2)(a) of Railway Establishment Code the Apex Court held that the intention is made clear
while interpreting the provisions of Rule 1730 of the Railways Establishment Code, the Apex Court took aid of the notes attached to the said Rules
