Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 3490 (2.43 seconds)

Bhajan Lal vs M/O Railways on 9 May, 2019

also been pleaded that the provisions of clause 9.21 of Railway Servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1968 have not been followed and lastly reasoned ... applicant. 6.1 In regard to compliance with clause 9.21 of the Railway Servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1968, reliance was placed on the decision
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Daya Shanker vs Union Of India on 13 August, 2025

haste manner. Mandatory provision provided under Rule 9 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and MANISH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA 4 Appeal) Rules have not been followed, thus ... evidence and to interrogate the applicant under Rule 9 (21) of Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968. It is further argued that mere
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next