Physical Efficiency Test being more physically efficient, the other candidates were not physically fit to qualify the Physical Efficiency Test. The petitioners were not required ... candidates more physically efficient.
It has been vehemently argued by learned counsel for petitioners that the very fact that Physical Efficiency Test on 21.7.2011 could
determining the minimum standard of physical efficiency and not comparative physical efficiency. In case a person is more physically efficient, it does not mean that ... common knowledge and common prudence that the efficiency of a candidate participating in Physical Efficiency Test would be much better than a candidate
2019 dated 19.10.2020 and consequentially
to direct the respondents to conduct physical efficiency test afresh taking
into account of the postponement physical efficiency test slated ... direction to
the respondents to conduct the physical efficiency test afresh, by taking
into consideration of the postponement of physical efficiency test
were issued to the candidates on 2.8.2019 for appearing in
the physical efficiency test on 16.8.2019.
2 As many as 528 candidates appeared in physical ... candidates qualified it. The
petitioner along with other candidates appeared for physical
efficiency test and qualified high jump, but he could not qualify
long jump
concerns subjecting
candidates seeking appointment to the post of Conductor
undergoing Physical Efficiency Test at Udaipur on 08.09.2018. In
the fourth appeal it relates ... Physical Efficiency Test conducted on
11.09.2018 at Kota. It is not in dispute that in the morning of
08.09.2018 there was a heavy rainfall
Director General (Road Development) ... vs Aam Aadmi Lokmanch . on 14 July, 2020
Equivalent citations: AIR
concerns subjecting
candidates seeking appointment to the post of Conductor
undergoing Physical Efficiency Test at Udaipur on 08.09.2018. In
the fourth appeal it relates ... Physical Efficiency Test conducted on
11.09.2018 at Kota. It is not in dispute that in the morning of
08.09.2018 there was a heavy rainfall
well only due to heavy rain.
6. Thus, the Physical Eligibility Test / Endurance Test / Physical Efficiency Test were conducted in accordance with the procedures ... arise at all. And the requirements for the Physical Measurement Test/Endurance Test/ Physical Efficiency Test are as follows:-
I. Physical Measurement Test PMT (Minimum
well only due to heavy rain.
6. Thus, the Physical Eligibility Test / Endurance Test / Physical Efficiency Test were conducted in accordance with the procedures ... arise at all. And the requirements for the Physical Measurement Test/Endurance Test/ Physical Efficiency Test are as follows:-
I. Physical Measurement Test PMT (Minimum
Dinesh Mehta, J) was a member.
2. Many appeals relating to Physical Efficiency Test of Constable
Recruitment, were decided by separate orders, considering the
difference ... facts, particularly with respect to the date, time and
place of Physical Efficiency Test, which were held for recruitment
to the post of Constable. While
