Rajaraman vs Subramaniyan on 25 September, 2015
Author: P.R.Shivakumar
Bench: P.R.Shivakumar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED ... JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR
S.A.No.461 of 2008
1.Rajaraman
2.Devaki .. Appellants
-Vs-
Subramaniyan .. Respondent
Second Appeal filed under section
Rajaraman vs M.P.Nethaji on 2 March, 2016
Author: P.R.Shivakumar
Bench: P.R.Shivakumar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS ... 3768 of 2011
and M.P.No.1 of 2011
T.Rajaraman ... Petitioner
Vs
1.M.P.Nethaji
2.Mani
3.Arumugam
4.Dorai
Velayutham vs Rajaraman @ Rajaram on 15 February, 2016
Author: P.R.Shivakumar
Bench: P.R.Shivakumar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED ... Velayutham ... Petitioner
Vs.
Rajaraman @ Rajaram ... Respondent
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal order
Deepa Priya vs Rajaraman on 13 April, 2016
Author: P.R.Shivakumar
Bench: P.R.Shivakumar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED ... Deepa Priya ... Petitioner
Vs.
Rajaraman ... Respondent
Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of Civil Procedure Code praying to withdraw and transfer the case
Villupuram.
For Appellant ... Mr. S. Pattabiraman, Govt. Advocate
For Respondents ... Mr. M. Rajaraman ... advanced by Mr. S. Pattabiraman, learned Government Advocate and by Mr. M. Rajaraman, learned counsel for the respondents were heard. The judgments of the court
file of learned district
Munsif, Uthamapalayam.
!For Petitioner ... Mr.G.Rajaraman for
in CRP 508/2004 Mr.M.C.Swamy
in CRP 22/2005
Asst. Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.
For appellant : Mr.Ashok Rajaraman
For Respondent : Mr.R.Manickavel for R1
-----
JUDGMENT
The plaintiff in the original suit
Respondents .. Mr.T.R.Rajagopal,
Senior Counsel, for
Mr.T.R.Rajaraman
:JUDGMENT
K.RAVIRAJA PANDIAN, J.
The appellants, who are defendants in original suits
Petitioners :Mr.M.Rajaraman
For Respondent :M/s.K.Sridhar Associates
J U D G M E N T
The plaintiff in the original suit ... parties are represented by counsel. The arguments advanced by Mr.M.Rajaraman, learned counsel for the revision petitioners and also by Mr.Sridhar, learned counsel
Ravi,
Special Government Pleader (AS)
For R-1 : Mr.T.R.Rajaraman
For R-2 : No Appearance
- - - - -
JUDGMENT
This appeal has been preferred against ... Ravi, learned Special Government Pleader representing the appellant, Mr.T.R.Rajaraman, learned counsel for the first respondent/claimant. There is no representation on behalf
