Rajaraman Liquidator Of Globe United ... vs Hindustan Brown Boveri Ltd. on 28 August, 1973
Equivalent citations: AIR1974DELHI200, [1975]45COMPCAS184(DELHI)
JUDGMENT
1. V. Rajaraman, Liquidator ... that the suit as framed and filed in the name of V. Rajaraman is not competent. Thirdly, it is alleged that no leave
Natasha Oberoi vs Rajaraman Shankar & Ors on 15 January, 2026
Author: Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
Bench: Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI ... Ambika Mathur, Ms. Niharika
Chhabra and Mr. Shivansh Vishwakarma, Advs.)
versus
1. RAJARAMAN SHANKAR
19, RAJPUR ROAD, 302-B
DELHI - 110054
2. VIKRAMJIT SINGH OBEROI
Rajaraman, Liquidator, Globe United ... vs Registrar Of Companies on 28 August, 1973
Equivalent citations: [1974]44COMPCAS330(DELHI), ILR1973DELHI870B
JUDGMENT
Khanna, J.
1. The only question ... passed a special resolution for its winding up voluntarily. Shri V. Rajaraman, the appellant before us, was appointed the liquidator and his remuneration was fixed
Patna 152.
17. As far as this Court is concerned, in V. Rajaraman Vs. Hindustan
Brown Boveri ... 2017 Page 7 of 10
the name of "Shri V. Rajaraman, Liquidator, Globe United Engineering
and Foundry Company
members unanimously decided to wind up the company; Shri V. Rajaraman was appointed as its Liquidator. A petition was subsequently presented to this Court ... Court.
(2) This application has been filed by the Liquidator, Shri V. Rajaraman, on a request made to him, at a general meeting held
learned counsel referred to the decision of Avadh Behari J , in V. Rajaraman v. Hindustan Brown Boveri Ltd. [1975] 45 Comp Case 184 (Delhi) where
Bombay Vs. Hakmaji Motaji & Co. AIR 1927 Bom 521 (DB); V.
Rajaraman Vs. Hindustan Brown Boveri Ltd. AIR 1974 Del 200;
Sanadhan Swimming Club
State Through Reference vs Ram Singh & Ors. on 13 March, 2014
Author: Reva Khetrapal
Respondents
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioner : Mr. N. Rajaraman and Mr. Subrata Das,
Advocates
For the Respondents ... respondent no.1.
CONTENTIONS OF THE PETITIONER
3. Mr. N. Rajaraman, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
had predicated his argument on the basis
