Union of India v. Mohd. Ramzan Khan (1991) 1 SCC 588: (AIR
1991 SC 471) both delivered by the Benches of three learned Judges. Civil ... exists even otherwise?
(iv) Whether the law laid down in Mohd. Ramzan Khan's case (AIR 1991 SC
471) (supra) will apply
Union Of India And Ors vs Mohd. Ramzan Khan on 20 November, 1990
Equivalent citations: 1991 AIR 471, 1990 SCR SUPL ... Ramaswamy
PETITIONER:
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
MOHD. RAMZAN KHAN
DATE OF JUDGMENT20/11/1990
BENCH:
MISRA, RANGNATH (CJ)
BENCH:
MISRA, RANGNATH
concerned. [1048G-H]
Union of India & Ors. v. Mohd Ramzan Khan, [1991] SCC 188,
1045
relied on.
Managing Director Electronics Corporation of India ... this Court in Union of India and Others v. Mohd
Ramzan Khan , [1991] 1 SCC 588. The Tribunal considered the
effect of the observations made
Tribunal relying upon the judgment in Union of India Vs.
Mohd. Ramzan Khan [ (1991) 1 SCC, 588 ] allowed the Original
Application holding that the order ... observations in Union of India and Others vs. Mohd. Ramzan
Khan (supra) to the effect that the judgment in the said
case would have only
Supreme Court in the case of Union of India v. Mohd. Ramzan Khan . According to them, after considering the earlier decisions as well ... Company, National Textile Corporation (NTC) and Nationalised Banks that in Mohd. Ramzan Khan, the Supreme Court was concerned only with 'Civil servants' governed
Khan And Anr. vs Ramzan Khan And Ors. on 9 March, 1918
Equivalent citations: 44IND. CAS.988, AIR 1918 ALLAHABAD 86
JUDGMENT
Piggott
much prior to the judgment in Union of India v. Mohd. Ramzan Khan 1991 (1) LLJ 29 (SC) where in the Supreme Court, while holding ... this ground. Learned Counsel would submit that since the judgment in Ramzan Khan 1991 (1) LLJ 29 (SC) was pronounced
Supreme Court reported in Union of India and Ors. v. Mohamed Ramzan Khan (1991)1 L.L.J. 29, the learned Counsel for the appellant ... right in his conclusions that the latest pronouncement in Mohamed Ramzan Khan 's case (1991)1 L.L.J. 29, authoritatively lays down
Ramzan Khan vs State Of Rajasthan And Anr. on 24 April, 2000
Equivalent citations: 2000CRILJ3406, 2000(2)WLC765, 2000(2)WLN229
Author: N.N. Mathur ... this Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 , petitioner Ramzan Khan through his father Bhai Khan has challenged the order of detention dated
Ramzan Khan And Ors. vs Mir Dad Khan And Anr. on 9 March, 1918
Equivalent citations: (1918)ILR 40ALL449
JUDGMENT
Piggott, J.
1. The suit
