does
not absolve the prosecution to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. In a
case of rape, the onus is always on the prosecution ... that the prosecution has to prove its case
beyond reasonable doubt applies equally to a case
of rape and there could be no presumption that
Apex Court while reiterating that in a rape case, the
accused could be convicted on the sole testimony of the prosecutrix if it is
capable ... that the prosecution
has to prove its case beyond reasonable
doubt applies equally to a case of rape and
there could be no presumption that
Apex Court while reiterating that in a rape
case, the accused could be convicted on the sole testimony of prosecutrix
if it is capable ... that the prosecution has to prove its case
beyond reasonable doubt applies equally to a case
of rape and there could be no presumption that
that the prosecution has to prove its case
beyond reasonable doubt applies equally to a case of
rape and there could be no presumption that ... Apex Court while reiterating that in a rape
case, the accused could be convicted on the sole testimony of the
prosecutrix if it is capable
they all hatched a conspiracy to involve Chander Pradhan in a
rape case. On 10.04.1994, the victim 'P' (changed name) was abducted ... namely Chander Pradhan was to be implicated in a false rape case. She
declined to implicate him. Dinesh Dubey told her that he would have
Apex Court while reiterating that in a rape case, the
accused could be convicted on the sole testimony of the prosecutrix ... that the prosecution has to prove its case
beyond reasonable doubt applies equally to a case
of rape and there could be no presumption that
Apex Court while reiterating that in a rape case, the
accused could be convicted on the sole testimony of the prosecutrix if it is
capable ... that the prosecution
has to prove its case beyond reasonable
doubt applies equally to a case of rape and
there could be no presumption that
that the prosecution has to prove its case
beyond reasonable doubt applies equally to a case
of rape and there could be no presumption that ... Supreme Court held :
"It is true that in a case of rape the evidence of the
Prosecutrix must be given predominant
consideration
valid reasons to deviate from it.
"Undoubtedly, in cases involving offence of
rape, the testimony of the prosecutrix, if
found to be worthy ... assurance about her testimony. It also needs
mention that even in cases of rape the onus
is always on the prosecution to prove
affirmatively
that the prosecution has to prove
its case beyond reasonable doubt applies equally
to a case of rape and there could be no
presumption that ... Supreme Court held :
'It is true that in a case of rape the evidence of the
Prosecutrix must be given predominant
consideration
