April, 1998. While in Calcutta, Anuradha
developed fever along with skin rash on 25th April, 1998. On 26th April, Dr.
Sukumar Mukherjee, Respondent ... However, two
weeks thereafter, i.e., on 7th May, 1998, the skin rash reappeared more
aggressively. Dr. Mukherjee was again contacted
stopped them and
started checking. In the meantime, BMW car driven rashly and
negligently came from Nizamuddin side at a high speed and dashed
violently ... Court has also held that though the act of accused
amounted to rashness and negligence endangering the lives of
others, since there was no intention
from the statements of these witnesses that
accused was driving the bus rashly and negligently and hit the
jeep or not and whether accused Ravi ... towards them near Bagar tiraha and this
bus was driven rashly and negligently and directly hit the jeep.
However, the Maruti car which was ahead
charge that the respondent has caused death of two persons by
rash and negligent driving of a motor vehicle.
2. The facts which are necessitous ... crime under Section 279 / 304A was
registered against the respondent for rash and negligent driving. The
learned trial Magistrate, Patiala framed charges for the offences
that the
accident occurred due to mechanical failure and not because of rash and
negligent driving. However, he chose not to adduce any evidence ... accident had not occurred due to mechanical defect but
there was rash and negligence on the part of the accused and the same had
been
less severe injuries. The charge against the appellant was that he was rash or negligent in crossing the railway track when a Goods train ... gate.
3. The appellant's defence was that he was neither rash nor negligent and the accident was unavoidable. He did not realize
stated that said Meru Cab Car was driven in a
rash and negligent manner by its driver and hit the back
side (hind portion ... driver of the
Meru Cab Car drove the said car in a rash and negligent
manner, endangering human life, without observing the
traffic rules
Sushil Ansal vs State Thr.Cbi on 5 March, 2014
Equivalent citations: 2014 AIR SCW
person must have been caused by the accused by doing any
rash or negligent act. In other words, there must be proof
that the rash ... must be direct nexus
between the death of a person and the rash or negligent act
of the accused. There is no presumption
finding that the accident in question was
not on account of rash and negligent driving of Truck bearing ... account of rash and negligent
driving of Maruti Car bearing No. U.P.02 D5292 resulting in
death of Balvinder Kaur who was sitting
