this Court considering the same question in a judgment in the case of Rasta Peth Education Society, Pune v. Pethkar Udhao Bhimashankar ... barred. The learned Single Judge also declared that the case of Rasta Peth Education Society has not been correctly decided and that the judgment
declaration
that the order dated 15.02.2023 passed in Rasta Case No.24 of 2020
by the Tahsildar is bad in law.
3. Applicants - defendants sought ... applicants submits that the suit for challenging order dated
15.02.2023 in Rasta Case No.24 of 2020 is not tenable as recourse to
remedy
view taken earlier by this Court (Dr. Saraf, J.) in the case of Rasta Peth Education Society, Pune v. Pethkar Udhav Bhimashankar , and therefore ... clear that the law laid down by this Court in the case of Rasta Peth Education Society (supra) can no more be held
present
case is completely distinct from the facts in the case of Devinder Singh.
According to learned Senior Counsel, in the case of Devinder Singh ... Government
committing to pay the cost of acquisition.
3. In case of through revenue Rasta's, the developer shall
provide an alternative passage
stair-case despite making statement before the
Court on 02.08.2002. Moreover, the plaintiff cannot be
permitted to construct stair-case on common passage/rasta ... blemished. In
this case, the plaintiff was intending to construct a stair-case
in the common passage/rasta in front of his house. The said
submissions
made and the record show that "Rasta Case" mentioned in the
crime punishable under section 353 of IPC was the case
learned Tahsildar, Himayatnagar, District
Nanded bearing Outward No.2024/JAMA-1/Rasta Case/CR, thereby,
directing the petitioners to remove an obstruction on the disputed
that 'Rasta' in dispute is a public 'Rasta'.
74. PW3 stated that defendants tried to encroach the 'Rasta ... stated
that Rasta/passage is a private Rasta/passage, on the other hand
during cross examination he stated that there is no Rasta/passage
marlas of land was
wasted and in case Baljit Singh (petitioner) was provided 'Rasta ' of
two 'Gathas' near the northern corner ... using this 'Rasta' for the last too much time. If
there had been problem of 'Rasta', the case for partition could
Thikana Beda. The mention of a rasta over the land which is in dispute in this case constitutes therefore an important admission on the part ... with which we are concerned in the present case was a rasta. This admission is a very strong piece of evidence, and it cannot
