members of the Grampanchayat filed a
proceeding which was registered as Rasta Case No.71/2014 on 05.11.2014
asserting that the disputed way has been ... appears that later on the
contesting respondents filed another Rasta Case which was registered as
Rasta Case No.1/2015 on 05.02.2015. Pertinently they raised
members of the Grampanchayat filed a
proceeding which was registered as Rasta Case No.71/2014 on 05.11.2014
asserting that the disputed way has been ... appears that later on the
contesting respondents filed another Rasta Case which was registered as
Rasta Case No.1/2015 on 05.02.2015. Pertinently they raised
Section 26 of the Act as
previously instituted proceedings in Rasta Case no.17 of 2006 was
rejected by Tehsildar by order dated 09 October ... Divisional Officer vide order dated 17 January 2008.
That Rasta Case No.14 of 2013 instituted by Respondent leading to
passing of impugned orders
Heard finally with consent at admission stage.
2. This is about rasta case.
3. Respondent nos. 5 to 13 have filed Rasta Vahivat Case ... Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906
which is registered as Rasta Case No. 24 of 2012 with the
specific pleading about existence of the road
this Court considering the same question in a judgment in the case of Rasta Peth Education Society, Pune v. Pethkar Udhao Bhimashankar ... barred. The learned Single Judge also declared that the case of Rasta Peth Education Society has not been correctly decided and that the judgment
declaration
that the order dated 15.02.2023 passed in Rasta Case No.24 of 2020
by the Tahsildar is bad in law.
3. Applicants - defendants sought ... applicants submits that the suit for challenging order dated
15.02.2023 in Rasta Case No.24 of 2020 is not tenable as recourse to
remedy
impugns the orders dated
28.6.2022 passed by the Tahsildar, Pachora in Rasta Case
No.31 of 2020 and the order dated 8.5.2023 passed ... 5590.2023.odt
District Jalgaon. Respondent nos. 3 to 8 filed Rasta Case
No.31 of 2020 under section 5 of the Mamlatdar
petitioner (original defendant) and respondents
No. 4 and 5 in Rasta Case No. 8/2013 confrmed by Sub-Divisional
Offcer, Pathardi, Dist. Ahmednagar, in Revision ... removal of obstruction, respondents
No.4 and 5 fled aforesaid Rasta Case before the learned Tahsildar,
Shevgaon.
5. Petitioner herein resisted the proceedings by fling
this writ petition, the petitioners-original respondents
in Rasta Case No.29 of 2012 (old) and Rasta Case No.15 of
2016 (new) seeks ... access their land.
4. The petitioners-original respondents in the said Rasta
Case have strongly resisted the said application by filing their
written statement
this writ petition, the petitioners-original respondents
in Rasta Case No.29 of 2012 (old) and Rasta Case No.15 of
2016 (new) seeks ... access their land.
4. The petitioners-original respondents in the said Rasta
Case have strongly resisted the said application by filing their
written statement
