Sharad Shivaji Golande And Others vs Bankat Dada Golande And Others on 23 September, 2020
impugning the judgment and order passed by
Tahsildar Shrigonda in Rasta Case No. 44/2018 on 05.04.2019 and the
order confirming it passed
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 478 (0.95 seconds)Sopan Rambhau Navghare vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 20 February, 2020
Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906 by which, Rasta Case
No.44/2014 filed by respondent Nos.4 to 11 was allowed
Kacharu Baburao Nangare vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 20 February, 2020
Section 5(2) of the
Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906 allowing Rasta Case No.24/2010, has been
::: Uploaded on - 21/02/2020 ::: Downloaded
Bharat Govardhan Pardeshi And Another vs The Sub Divisional Officer Jalgaon And ... on 5 February, 2020
petitioners and the feld of
other respondents in the Rasta Case and that the said way was
obstrufted.
::: Uploaded on - 07/02/2020 ::: Downloaded
Subhash Chand Ajmera, Jaipur vs Ito, Jaipur on 31 January, 2020
case of Late
Sh. Tarachand Ajmera (Legal Heir Shri Subhash Ajmera- PAN
AATPA4912G), 3659, Bhoot Ke Kuven Ki Gali, Moti Singh Bhomio Ka
Rasta, Johari ... case of Shri Tarachand Ajmera PAN - AATPA4923B, 3659 Bhoot Ke Kuye
Ki Gali, MSB Ka Rasta, Johari Bazar, Jaipur, that assessee has sold two
properties
Municipal Corporation Gurugram vs Suresh Kumar & Ors on 12 February, 2020
provide higher order
infrastructure on the rasta otherwise falls in the category of non-
revenue rastas or unauthorized rastas.
iv. Petitioners land was a Gair ... Gram Panchayat, Sukhrali had provided
services in the said rasta. It is not a case also that the Corporation is trying to
create
Chikonda Moulali vs The State Of A.P. on 29 February, 2020
Nandyal. To a suggestion that a false case has been foisted because
of a dispute over rasta between the accused and PW2 was denied ... shows existence of some disputes between both of them with
regard to rasta.
13
26) For the foregoing reasons, I feel that the prosecution
Rambalak Bhagat vs The State Of Bihar on 28 January, 2020
house and
that the case had taken place because the accused persons had
been asking for 'Rasta' which they were not ready ... dispute with respect to 'Rasta' between the prosecution and the
defence parties. While the consistent case of the prosecution
from the very beginning
Jalim Singh vs State Of U.P. And Another on 1 December, 2020
Bench: Ali Zamin
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 36
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 21452 of 2020
Applicant :Jalim Singh
Opposite ... supported the prosecution case. It is further submitted that, due to rasta dispute, applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case. There
Pappu Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 9 November, 2020
POCSO Act.
The prosecution case in brief is that the informant of
this case has given written application to the S.H.O. of
Kowakole ... falsely been implicated in this
case. Both parties are gotiya and due to petty dispute for Rasta,
the informant created a false story and implicated