Clause (4) of the said article further provides
for the appointment of RCs to assist the Election Commission
in the performance of its functions ... Parliament, The conditions of
service and the lenure of office of the RCs shall be such as
may be determined by rule made
Clause (4) of the said article further provides
for the appointment of RCs to assist the Election Commission
in the performance of its functions ... Parliament, The conditions of
service and the lenure of office of the RCs shall be such as
may be determined by rule made
defendant has earlier
instituted a suit against the first respondent-plaintiff in RCS
No.1004/1988 and the said suit was dismissed as withdrawn ... According to
the appellant-defendant, earlier he instituted a suit in RCS
No.1004/1988 against the first respondent-plaintiff and during
the pendency
ranks in the first matter
arising from the suit for possession in RCS No.278/1993.
2. The case of appellants is as under ... tenant of the suit
portions (two rooms) and filed RCS 114/1993 on the file of the Civil Judge,
Junior Division, Vita, against the first
Bankmens CGHS, Registrar of Co-
operative Societies (hereinafter referred to as ‘RCS’) and the Delhi
Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as ‘DDA’). The Bankmens
CGHS ... comply with various directions of the RCS and it was placed
under liquidation on 30.03.1992. Though Liquidator was appointed, he did
not take over
Civil SD. Court, Ms. Lokhandwala Disposed
Thane Weigh Bridge Vs. M/s
RCS/200577/2005 Asam Transport
2. 4th Civil Judge Firdaus Rajabali ... Civil Judge Firoz Pirbhai 16/09/2016
Sr. Division, Thane Lokhandwala Vs
RCS/201541/2001 Nooruddin Pirbhai
Lokhandwala
5. Add. Dist. Judge, Mehraj Rajabali
facts, the appellants herein filed Regular
Civil Suit No.167 of 1974, RCS No.211 of 1977 and RCS No.240 of 1980
against ... point out that when the
appellants filed the first suit in RCS No. 167/1974, the suit was laid
for recovery of the rent amounting
proceedings came to be registered as the Dispute Case
No. 47/RCS of 2002-03 filed under Section 95(1) of the West
Bengal ... Arbitrator vide Award dated 21.12.2004 passed in the
Dispute Case No. 47/RCS of 2002-03, inter alia, directed as under:
“1) That the society
case filed under
section 13 (1) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 bearing
RCS(HM) No. 1379 of 2022 titled as Sandesh Sharda
Versus Rinku Baheti ... Thereafter, on 01.08.2022, the respondent filed a divorce
petition bearing RCS(HM) No.1146/2022 before the Family Court,
Bhopal, under Section
defendants
and the defendants will bear their
own expenses.
….”
11. RCS No.47A/01 and one more were decided on
14.05.2001 and thereafter ... table below:
S.No. Civil Suit Party Name Decided
No. on.
1. RCS No. Bharat Kumar Lathi vs. 14.05.2001
22-A/97 Kaliash Agarwal
