thereafter were revived by Registrar,
Cooperative Societies (hereinafter referred as 'The RCS') Delhi on the
basis of false/forged documents ... recommendation of the RCS.
Land was allotted to these societies by the RCS. The preliminary enquiry
CRL.REV.P. 1021/2018 Page
order (29.12.2020) of the Registrar, Co-operative
Societies, Punjab, (for short 'RCS') passed while rejecting the objection
petitions against the proposed amalgamation ... Cases
Pursuant to the aforesaid decision of the Cabinet, on 29.12.2018
the RCS requested The Reserve Bank of India (hereinafter referred
passed
Abubakarbhai by the Civil Judge
Tinwala (S.D.), Bhavnagar in
RCS No.762 of 1997
5. Mushtaqbhai
Alibhai Sheikh
Civil High Court of Challenging ... amendment
3. The Mamlatdar, No. 411 of by the Civil Judge in RCS No.13 of 1998.
Bhavnagar 1999 (S.D.) in RCS
passed
Abubakarbhai by the Civil Judge
Tinwala (S.D.), Bhavnagar in
RCS No.762 of 1997
5. Mushtaqbhai
Alibhai Sheikh
Civil High Court of Challenging ... amendment
3. The Mamlatdar, No. 411 of by the Civil Judge in RCS No.13 of 1998.
Bhavnagar 1999 (S.D.) in RCS
from the 4th
respondent Lr. No.
SE/VEDC/VPM/DFC/
AO/Rev/RCS/D.33/201
3-14 dated 16.09.2013
billing start-up power
under ... from the 4th
respondent Lr. No.
SE/VEDC/VPM/DFC/
AO/Rev/RCS/D.34/201
3-14 dated 16.09.2013
and the subsequent
revised demand
from the 4th
respondent Lr. No.
SE/VEDC/VPM/DFC/
AO/Rev/RCS/D.33/201
3-14 dated 16.09.2013
billing start-up power
under ... from the 4th
respondent Lr. No.
SE/VEDC/VPM/DFC/
AO/Rev/RCS/D.34/201
3-14 dated 16.09.2013
and the subsequent
revised demand
dated 07.09.2013, and the
consequent letter No. SE/TEDC/AO/Rev./RCS/A.1/F.start up power / D.388-
2/13 dated 12.11.2013 received ... dated 07.09.2013, and the
consequent letter No. SE/TEDC/AO/Rev./RCS/A.1/F.start up power /D.388-
2/13 dated 12.11.2013 received
aforesaid application (CM APPL. 12816/2021), the
appellant/Registrar Cooperative Society (RCS) seeks condonation of 111
days' delay in filing the present appeal ... Date:20.04.2021
14:05:58
go into the justification provided by the RCS for the delay in filing the
appeal.
4. The present appeal
from
Orders that Dwarkabai Babasaheb Pokale, who was
defendant No.6 in RCS No.322/2005, had filed RCS
No.95/2005 for partition, separate ... 2019 & Ors.
Babasaheb is legal. Defendant No.5 is plaintiff in
RCS No.322/2005. During pendency of the suit,
Dwarkabai expired
from
Orders that Dwarkabai Babasaheb Pokale, who was
defendant No.6 in RCS No.322/2005, had filed RCS
No.95/2005 for partition, separate ... 2019 & Ors.
Babasaheb is legal. Defendant No.5 is plaintiff in
RCS No.322/2005. During pendency of the suit,
Dwarkabai expired
