execution of the sale agreement,
defendant No.6 and No.7 filed RCS No.510/2003 against
defendant No.1 and No.2 hence, despite ... involved in it.
ii. Mark 3/38 is the plaint of RCS No.510/2003. It was filed
for the suit property
passed
Abubakarbhai by the Civil Judge
Tinwala (S.D.), Bhavnagar in
RCS No.762 of 1997
5. Mushtaqbhai
Alibhai Sheikh
Civil High Court of Challenging ... amendment
3. The Mamlatdar, No. 411 of by the Civil Judge in RCS No.13 of 1998.
Bhavnagar 1999 (S.D.) in RCS
passed
Abubakarbhai by the Civil Judge
Tinwala (S.D.), Bhavnagar in
RCS No.762 of 1997
5. Mushtaqbhai
Alibhai Sheikh
Civil High Court of Challenging ... amendment
3. The Mamlatdar, No. 411 of by the Civil Judge in RCS No.13 of 1998.
Bhavnagar 1999 (S.D.) in RCS
therefore, they filed one frivolous suit for
declaration and permanent injunction bearing RCS No.
Page 8 of 30
Downloaded ... furthe the case of the appelalnt that the
appellant was field RCS No.209/2009 for specific
performance of contract of agreement to sale dated
deceased Khodaji.
Simultaneously, she filed similar application in another
suit proceedings being RCS No. 622 of 1992 and prayed
that she may be joined ... Khodaji before the learned Trial Court in both
the proceedings i.e. RCS No.622 of 1992 and RCS
been preferred by the Methodist Church of India, praying for
various reliefs. RCS No.93 of 2001 had been preferred inter alia
praying ... defendants No.5 to 9 was called into question.
4.2. Insofar as RCS No.104 of 2001 was concerned, the said suit
plaint and
reply to the injunction application, in the said
suit being RCS No. 338 of 1998.
3.6 It is also claimed that ... staying and subsequently
the respondent of present petition filed suit
being RCS No. 32 of 1998 against father of the
petitioner
pointed out by the other side while resisting the injunction application in RCS No.165/2000. It is averred that above-quoted prohibitory order dated ... which they came to know about the order in the proceedings in RCS No.165/2000.
3. It has been argued by ld. Sr.Counsel
Hanspur Road Co.Op.Housing Society Ltd vs Vithal Mandir Trust on 12 January, 2023
filed
objections against the maintainability of the said first suit
(i.e. RCS No.4 of 2012).
3.7 According to the petitioners, the respondents
tendered ... neither prayed for nor granted and
therefore also the said second suit (RCS No.65/2012) is
not maintainable. He also submitted that the said
