Defence, New Delhi and Prahald Kumar Thirwani, Senior
Auditor, Registrar Cooperative Societies (RCS), New Delhi and
other unknown persons entered into a criminal conspiracy ... office records,
Sh. Prasad Kumar P. (A-5), Dealing Assistant, office of RCS,
Delhi wrote a note sheet in which he mentioned the present status
execution of the sale agreement,
defendant No.6 and No.7 filed RCS No.510/2003 against
defendant No.1 and No.2 hence, despite ... involved in it.
ii. Mark 3/38 is the plaint of RCS No.510/2003. It was filed
for the suit property
from the
impugned order dated 18.12.2013/26.12.2013 passed by the RCS, after the
Hon'ble High Court of Delhi vide its Order ... Bhutani could not be cleared.
The said contention was rejected by the RCS in the light of judgment
of Ishwar Nagar CHBS Ltd. Vs. Parma
case, there is no dispute as regards basic facts. The
decree in RCS No. 319 of 2000 has declared the sale deed in favour ... years, Anant Lale neither instituted any suit to question
decree in RCS No. 319 of 2000 nor did he take out any other application
case, there is no dispute as regards basic facts. The
decree in RCS No. 319 of 2000 has declared the sale deed in favour ... years, Anant Lale neither instituted any suit to question
decree in RCS No. 319 of 2000 nor did he take out any other application
brought on record.
9. The landlord, had earlier initiated a suit namely RCS
No.602/2002, against the tenant, claiming a decree for eviction ... 2010,
KHUNTE
WP-1645.23-Judgment 5/22
the landlord had filed RCS No.105/2012, a suit for eviction under
section
deceased Khodaji.
Simultaneously, she filed similar application in another
suit proceedings being RCS No. 622 of 1992 and prayed
that she may be joined ... Khodaji before the learned Trial Court in both
the proceedings i.e. RCS No.622 of 1992 and RCS
held to be voidable in respect of Babu and Subhash, Plaintiff in RCS
171/1969 (Govind Raosaheb Khatmode) has not been declared as owner ... share belonging to
the three granddaughters. That therefore dismissal of RCS No.171 of
1969 is inconsequential for execution of the decree passed in RCS
been preferred by the Methodist Church of India, praying for
various reliefs. RCS No.93 of 2001 had been preferred inter alia
praying ... defendants No.5 to 9 was called into question.
4.2. Insofar as RCS No.104 of 2001 was concerned, the said suit
chief he had produced a certified
copy of the plaint in RCS No.298/2011 at Exh.40 filed by the said
Manoj Ambule against ... sons of the original applicant and the plaint in RCS No.298/2011
(Manoj Dewaji Ambule Vs. Manohar) a suit for declaration and
permanent injunction
