Search Results Page

Search Results

51 - 60 of 522 (0.68 seconds)

A.Porkodi vs Mrs.Leelavathi

Act. If any proceedings are initiated under the SARFAESI Act , even third parties can question by filing an Appeal under Section 17 the RDDBFI Act ... Act also is a pointer to that too. We have also noticed the scheme of the Act. It has a limited jurisdiction. Under the Act

Shri Vallabha Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. ... vs Bank Of India on 20 April, 2015

Section 18  of the  SARFAESI   Act   with   Section   20   of   the  RDDBFI   Act,   I   find   that   in   Section   18   not   only   the   period   of   limitation ... also   been   excluded   which   is  provided   in   Section   20   of   the   RDDBFI  Act.   This itself leaves no iota of doubt  that   the   legislature   has   consciously
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State Bank Of India vs S.Ramesh Narayanan

SARFAESI Act ”) read with Section 18 of Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as the “RDDBFI Act ... this connection, we would only remember Section 25 of the RDDBFI Act which facilitates attachment and sale of movable or immovable properties of the defendants
Madras High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - M M Sundresh - Full Document

Lakshmi Villas Bank Ltd vs C.Gopalakrishnan ..1St

which was dismissed. iv) As per the Section 18 of the RDDBFI Act 1993, no Court or other authority shall have or be entitled ... specified the jurisdiction after proceedings initiated under Section 17 of the RDDBFI Act 1993, once the proceedings have been initiated thereunder. Therefore, the present suit
Madras High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Previous   2 3 4 5 6   7 8 9 10 11 Next