further contends, even if one equates re-evaluation with the
term "re-examination" as provided in Regulation 14(2), the answer
scripts ... will be re-assessed. Neither the candidate nor
any one on his behalf shall been entitled to be present during
scrutiny/re-examination or shall
which the examination
was conducted there is no scope of re-evaluation or re-examination of the answer-
scripts.
In the instant case, the examination ... which at the relevant time did not provide for any re-evaluation or re-
examination of the answer-scripts. Relying upon the ratio laid down
Chandra Prakash Sharma And Ors vs The State Of Bihar And Ors on 9 August
CWJC No.1504 of 2018 dt.19-07-2019
28/76
examination and re-draw the merit list on
that basis. For those who have ... inevitable and inexorable consequence of
such a re-evaluation. The re-evaluation
process may additionally benefit those who
have lost the hope of an appointment
CWJC No.1504 of 2018 dt.19-07-2019
28/76
examination and re-draw the merit list on
that basis. For those who have ... inevitable and inexorable consequence of
such a re-evaluation. The re-evaluation
process may additionally benefit those who
have lost the hope of an appointment
CWJC No.1504 of 2018 dt.19-07-2019
28/76
examination and re-draw the merit list on
that basis. For those who have ... inevitable and inexorable consequence of
such a re-evaluation. The re-evaluation
process may additionally benefit those who
have lost the hope of an appointment
CWJC No.1504 of 2018 dt.19-07-2019
28/76
examination and re-draw the merit list on
that basis. For those who have ... inevitable and inexorable consequence of
such a re-evaluation. The re-evaluation
process may additionally benefit those who
have lost the hope of an appointment
CWJC No.1504 of 2018 dt.19-07-2019
28/76
examination and re-draw the merit list on
that basis. For those who have ... inevitable and inexorable consequence of
such a re-evaluation. The re-evaluation
process may additionally benefit those who
have lost the hope of an appointment
Counsel emphasises sub-rule which provides that scrutiny
shall not involve re-examination or a fresh evaluation of answer scripts. It makes
a distinction between ... only avail of scrutiny of his marks and not re-evaluation or re-
examination, which calls for a fresh assessment of the petitioner
main
examination was held on 30.07.2011 and 31.07.2011. The
written examination comprised of 3 papers. The result
of the main examination was declared ... sheet scripts pertaining to Papers
II and III of the main examination re-evaluated. For
5
this purpose, the answer papers in the custody
