Inspector and the third
sample was retained for court purpose.
5) The report of Insecticide Analyst, Pune was received and
it was to the effect ... requested to send another sample to Central
Insecticide Laboratory, Faridabad. The reanalysis report from Central
Laboratory was received on 7.1.2015. This report also showed that
Director of Agriculture, Latur Division. The samples were sent for
reanalysis; however, its report was awaited, then the present crime is
registered against the applicant ... Learned counsel for the applicant has vehemently argued
that the reanalysis report was awaited; hence, the FIR is premature.
There are no complaints from
Seeds Act to get the reanalysis done prior to said
date. Since it was not sent for reanalysis, the petitioners lost their
3 63-CrWP ... made for reanalysis. The wording clearly shows that it is
the report after reanalysis by the Central Seed Laboratory that
prevails upon the report
2017 23:59:29 :::
( 11 ) Cri.Appln.2019 of 2006
of the report of Public Analyst to the effect that food
article is adulterated ... days from
the receipt of report for forwarding the samples to
Central Food Laboratory for reanalysis. The sample was
drawn on 16.9.2004 and was analysed
following
decisions:
( 1) Lalankumar Singh and ors vs. State of
Maharashtra , reported in 2022 SCC OnLine SC
1383, and
.....9/-
Judgment ... satisfied by this Analysis Report, he found it
erroneous. He has sent one sample part of reanalysis to
the Referral Food Laboratory, Ghaziabad in Uttar
notice on M/s Knoll Healthcare Pvt Ltd, the
distributor alongwith the report of Government Analyst and a portion of the
sample constitutes sufficient compliance ... reanalysis of the sample, as the Petitioner had not notified the Inspector or
Court that it intended to adduce evidence in controvention of the report
deliver the
property or valuable security. Undisputedly on the consideration
of the F.I.R. in question it does not disclose any fact which ... filed and the FIR is lodged i.e. also not by
the authorized Officer and no sample was available for
reanalysis after filing
such form as may be
prescribed, one copy of the (2) report of the
result of the analysis to the Seed Inspector and
another copy ... filed and the FIR is lodged i.e. also
not by the authorized Officer and no sample was available
for reanalysis after filing
Local Authority, Chandrapur. The report of Public
Analyst was received through local health authority on 25.09.1992
reporting that the sample was adulterated. Pursuant to consent ... report and intimation of institution of the complaint were sent to
the accused.
4] Accused Baban applied for sending the second sample
for reanalysis
JUDGMENT.odt
4(xvii). Thus, after receipt of Analytical/Test Report from
Mumbai, the complainant sent sample part and asked for
documents regarding constitution ... Company and was also absent for
depositing the fee for reanalysis the sample, therefore the
complainant constrained to file the complaint against the
present Applicants
