sample in their possession and that the test report was contrary to the report
of the Government Analyst. The respondent had enquired about the sample ... sent to the Central Drug Laboratory for reanalysis. Further,
the Drugs Inspector provided copy of the Analytical Report in Form 2 bearing
exercised their
right to seek reanalysis of the drug; that since the petitioners who were
notified about the report of the Government Analyst in terms ... reported in (2018) 15 SCC 93, the accused therein had indicated
his desire to have the sample sent to the Central Laboratory for reanalysis
which
reported in (2010) 7 SCC 726 and in the case of Northern Minerals
Limited and others Vs. Rajasthan Government and another reported ... report was received and
the show cause notice was issued to the accused persons; Reply was
submitted on 06.10.2016, expressing their willingness for reanalysis
letter dated
11.07.2018 that they do not agree with the report of the Government
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ... Appellate Central drugs Laboratory for reanalysis. The Central Drugs
Laboratory by its report dated 08.02.2019 declared the sample to be of
Standard Quality
analysis.
(3) The report sent by the Central Seed Laboratory under subsection(2)
shall supersede the report given by the Seed Analyst under subsection ... right to send the same for reanalysis
within 28 days from the date of receipt of analysis report from the Seed
Analyst
analysis.
(3) The report sent by the Central Seed Laboratory under subsection(2)
shall supersede the report given by the Seed Analyst under subsection ... right to send the same for reanalysis
within 28 days from the date of receipt of analysis report from the Seed
Analyst
test and hence, they do not accept the
Government Analyst's report. The counsel for the petitioner further submitted
that after the testing done ... Government
Analyst sent the samples for reanalysis, which also confirmed the earlier
test. But, that report was not given to the petitioner. Merely because
controvert the report. In the present cases the Insecticides Inspector was
notified that the accused intended to adduce evidence to controvert the report ... facts given in the report of the
Government Analyst, the fourth sample with the Magistrate had not been sent for
reanalysis. The observations in Amery
chemical analysis. The said product was seized on 29.08.2007 and the analysis
report was given on 28.09.2007 and only on 12.05.2010 a notice has been ... willingness for reanalysis
after 3 years. The learned counsel for the petitioner relied on a judgment of
this Court reported
20982 of 2016
the accused intended to adduce evidence
to controvert the report. By the time the
matter reached the Court, the shelf life ... facts
given in the report of the Government Analyst, the
fourth sample with the Magistrate had not been sent
for reanalysis. The observations in Amery
