Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 17 (0.62 seconds)

State vs 1) Guljaman @ Gullu on 6 July, 2010

unless it is established so. It is further submitted that the reanalysis report Ex. CW-1/A of the sample drawn from the contraband during ... that since nothing new or alien has come in the reanalysis report, no benefit can be given to the accused on account of the broken
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Mahendrakumar on 24 November, 2010

Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955." Upon receipt of the report the complainant, after obtaining sanction, filed complaint against the respondent - accused ... report was received on 18.5.2002 and then the complaint was filed. On 3.6.2002 at Exhibit 74, respondent original accused has made application for reanalysis
Gujarat High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Z K Saiyed - Full Document

Date Of Decision: 06.05.2 vs State Of Punjab on 6 May, 2010

Chief Agriculture Officer Jalandhar, on 31.08.06, for the purpose of analysis. The report of the Senior Analyst, Insecticide Lab, Amritsar, was received, on 05.10.06, according ... Thus, the samples were found to be misbranded. A copy of the report of the Senior Analyst, Insecticide Lab, Amritsar, in respect of the samples
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next