occasion for any comparison between the two reports
and plea of variations in findings in two reports cannot be considered.
10. Rule 2.4.6 of FSSR ... commodity
was then sent to the Referral Food Laboratory, Mysore for reanalysis. The
report of RFL received, therefore, in view of the provision as contained
receipt of the copy
of the analysis report from the Designated Officer.
Report of the referral laboratory shall be final in this
regard ... commodity
was then sent to the Referral Food Laboratory, Mysore for reanalysis. The
report of RFL received, therefore, in view of the provision as contained
receipt of the
copy of the analysis report from the Designated Officer.
Report of the referral laboratory shall be final in this
regard ... commodity was then sent to the Referral Food Laboratory, Mysore for
reanalysis. The report of RFL received, therefore, in view of the provision
FSAT
receipt of the
copy of the analysis report from the Designated Officer.
Report of the referral laboratory shall be final in this
regard ... commodity was then sent to the Referral Food
Laboratory, Mysore for reanalysis. The report of RFL received, therefore, in
view of the provision as contained
receipt of the copy of the analysis
report from the Designated Officer. Report of the
referral laboratory shall be final in this regard ... commodity was then sent to the Referral Food Laboratory,
Mysore for reanalysis. The report of RFL received, therefore, in view of
the provision as contained
receipt of the
copy of the analysis report from the Designated Officer.
Report of the referral laboratory shall be final in this
regard ... commodity was then sent to the Referral Food Laboratory, Mysore for
reanalysis. The report of RFL received, therefore, in view of the provision
as contained
receipt of the
copy of the analysis report from the Designated Officer.
Report of the referral laboratory shall be final in this
regard ... commodity was then sent to the Referral Food Laboratory, Mysore
for reanalysis. The report of RFL received, therefore, in view of the
provision as contained
minimum limit of 8.5%. On receipt of the Food Analyst's report
from the Designated Officer, the appellants requested for sending the
sample ... commodity was
then sent to the Referral Food Laboratory, Mysore for reanalysis. The report
of RFL received, therefore, in view of the provision as contained
receipt of the
copy of the analysis report from the Designated Officer.
Report of the referral laboratory shall be final in this
regard ... commodity was then sent to the Referral Food Laboratory, Mysore
for reanalysis. The report of RFL received, therefore, in view of the
provision as contained
receipt of the copy of
the analysis report from the Designated Officer. Report of the referral
laboratory shall be final in this regard ... commodity was then sent to the Referral Food Laboratory, Mysore for
reanalysis. The report of RFL received, therefore, in view of the
FSAT
