sample to be sent for reanalysis
to the Commissioner of Agriculture, Sheshadri Road,
Bangalore. The complainant receives the test report on
17.09.2019 from the Analyst ... standard one. The copy of the said reanalysis report
was issued to accused No.1 along with a notice and also to
the petitioner
same was sent to analyst. Thereafter,
the Analyst sent a report on 11.11.2010 stating that the sample
referred was misbranded quality as defined in Section ... clearly expressed its intention to controvert
5
analysis report and requested to send the sample for reanalysis.
But the respondent Department instead of sending
copies of the Analytical report in Form No.XVII
(misbranded report) along with show cause notice dated
18.03.2010 was sent to Accused ... Central Insecticides Laboratory for reanalysis on 13.07.2010
vide Dis.No.1216. The Central Insecticides Laboratory's report
was received from the learned Magistrate
days
from the date of receipt of the copy of the report to get
the sample of the article of food kept by the Local ... reported in 2017 (1) Cr.L.R. (Guj.)
54, it is observed that the petitioners have been deprived from
their valuable right of reanalysis
collected was sent for
analysis to Seed Testing Laboratory at Junagadh. The
report dated 17.12.2005, issued by Junagadh Laboratory
shows that, the sample of tomato ... much as the report of Central Seeds
Laboratory would according to the provisions contained in
Section 16(3) , supersedes the report given by the State
Analyst
submitted the report on 09.09.2011 in FORM-13. The Drug
Inspector sent a letter enclosing the copy of the report
submitted by the Government ... subject drug for reanalysis to the Central Drugs Laboratory
within 28 days of the receipt of the copy of the report as
specified under Section
sent. Instead, what was sent on 22-
3-2012 was only the report of the Government Analyst. When the part of
the sample ... have another part of the sample sent to the Central Laboratory for
reanalysis. This was refused on the ground that the aforesaid request was
made
sent. Instead, what was sent on 22-
3-2012 was only the report of the Government Analyst. When the part of
the sample ... have another part of the sample sent to the Central Laboratory for
reanalysis. This was refused on the ground that the aforesaid request was
made
sent. Instead, what was sent on 22-
3-2012 was only the report of the Government Analyst. When the part of
the sample ... have another part of the sample sent to the Central Laboratory for
reanalysis. This was refused on the ground that the aforesaid request was
made
sent. Instead, what was sent on 22-
3-2012 was only the report of the Government Analyst. When the part of
the sample ... have another part of the sample sent to the Central Laboratory for
reanalysis. This was refused on the ground that the aforesaid request was
made
