Seeds Act to get the reanalysis done prior to said
date. Since it was not sent for reanalysis, the petitioners lost their
3 63-CrWP ... made for reanalysis. The wording clearly shows that it is
the report after reanalysis by the Central Seed Laboratory that
prevails upon the report
exercised their
right to seek reanalysis of the drug; that since the petitioners who were
notified about the report of the Government Analyst in terms ... reported in (2018) 15 SCC 93, the accused therein had indicated
his desire to have the sample sent to the Central Laboratory for reanalysis
which
following
decisions:
( 1) Lalankumar Singh and ors vs. State of
Maharashtra , reported in 2022 SCC OnLine SC
1383, and
.....9/-
Judgment ... satisfied by this Analysis Report, he found it
erroneous. He has sent one sample part of reanalysis to
the Referral Food Laboratory, Ghaziabad in Uttar
Skymap Pharmaceuticals, was
collected for analysis. The Government Analyst, Jaipur, vide
report dated 15.01.2013, declared the sample as not of
standard quality ... portion of the sample to the
manufacturer for reanalysis in case of a disputed report. The
Hon'ble Supreme Court in Medicamen Biotech
Skymap Pharmaceuticals, was
collected for analysis. The Government Analyst, Jaipur,
vide report dated 15.01.2013, declared the sample as not
of standard quality ... portion of the sample to the
manufacturer for reanalysis in case of a disputed report.
The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Medicamen Biotech
undefined
traces of medicine. The samples were analyzed on
05.12.1991 but the report was signed on 13.12.1991 and
from 31.01.1992 to 29.03.1993 there ... reanalysis of the sample was given
on 12.08.1993 and the report of the reanalysis is produced
at Exh. 79 which bears the signature of some
case although PW-2 Abdul Majeed states of sending the report along with the report of Public Analyst to the accused-revisionist by registered post ... delivery of the said report to the accused would defeat his right of sending the sample for reanalysis before the Central Food Laboratory. He submits
complaint. The report of Government
Analyst dated 24.02.1999 can be challenged by the accused by
making a prayer for its reanalysis by the Director, Central
sample nor
the report has ever been provided to the petitioners. Perusal of the file
reveals that no such report has been provided ... Laborate
4|Page
Pharmaceuticals India Ltd. v. State of T.N. , reported in (2018) 15 SCC
93, wherein in para
order.
14. In the light of above discussion, on re-appreciation and
reanalysis of evience, even this Court is convinced that PW2
complainant ... witnesses, are
not consistent on the chronology of events. Very lodgment of report
has come under shadow of doubt. Prosecuting agency has delayed
