Section 93 in The Railways Act, 1989 [Entire Act]
delivery unless the railway administration further proves that it has used reasonable foresight and care in the carriage of the goods
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 1726 (1.71 seconds)Union Of India (Uoi) vs Haji S. Umbichi Koya on 14 August, 1972
fire can only be traced to want of exercise of reasonable foresight and care on the part of the railway servants" and that ... delivery unless the administration further proves that it has used reasonable foresight and care in the carriage of the animals or goods."
The Indian
Kedarnath Jagdish Rai And Hemraj Lalji ... vs The Union Of India (Uoi) Owning Southern ... on 29 August, 2003
inherent vice of the commodity?
(iii)Whether the railways used reasonable foresight and care in the carriage of the goods?
(iv)Whether the applicant ... third point, the Tribunal held that the Railways failed to use reasonable foresight and care in the carriage of goods and answered the point against
T. Muddu Veerappa Sons And K.H. Veeranna ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr. on 26 March, 1971
nondelivery unless the administration further proves that it has usrd reasonable foresight and care in the carriage of the animals or goods".
The next ... loss etc.. unless the administration further proves that it has used reasonable foresight and care jn the carriage of the animals or goods
The Associated Cotton Traders Ltd. And ... vs The Union Of India (Uoi), Owning ... on 29 January, 1976
Railway administration with the onus of proving that it had used reasonable foresight and care in the carriage of goods during the period of transit ... cast upon the administration to prove that they have exercised reasonable foresight and care in the carriage of the animals or goods entrusted to them
The General Manager, Southern Railway, ... vs Agarwal Traders on 20 April, 2001
conclusion that the Railway Administration had failed to establish use of reasonable foresight and care in the carriage of the consignments in question and therefore ... Administration did not satisfactorily establish that it had used reasonable foresight and care in the carriage of the consignment and avoidance of the loss. There
K.R. Rajamanickam Chettiar And Ors. vs The Union Of India on 12 September, 1973
delivery unless the railway administration further proves that it has used reasonable foresight and care in the carriage of the animals or goods ... goods, unless it is established that the railway administration has used reasonable foresight and care in the carriage of the animals or goods in question
Firm Of Chabildas Manikdas And ... vs The Union Of India on 27 August, 1979
delivery unless the administration further proves that it has used reasonable foresight and care in the carriage of animals or goods ... damage unless the Railway Administration further proves that it has used reasonable foresight and care in the carriage of the goods. when goods are delivered
The Delhi Cloth & General Mills Co. Ltd. vs Union Of India on 11 March, 1974
negligence or misconduct or want of reasonable foresight and care on the part of the Railway Administration" and claims from the Union ... shortage was due to negligence and misconduct or want of reasonable foresight and care on the part of the Railway Administration or its employees
Hundraj Chhangomal And Co. vs Union Of India (Uoi) on 21 October, 1976
delivery unless the administration further proves that It has used reasonable foresight and care in the carriage of the animals or goods.
This section provides ... protection the railway administration must prove that it had used reasonable foresight and care in the carriage of the animals or goods. This section clearly