suit. In our view, the suit shall remain a suit for
specific performance of the contract for sale and a
separate independent suit ... Plaintiff is seeking
the specific Performance of the suit property without seeking the
Rectification of said Agreement dated 21st August, 2006.
The perusal
Naresh Chand Jain Vs Mirahul Enterprises and others
(Suit For Rectification & Specific Performance Of The Contract Of Sale dated
02.06.1986 And For Prohibitory Injunction ... forcibly dispossessing
him from the suit property, which was registered as suit
No.304/1986, but the said suit was rejected under Order VII
Rule
Paras Ram, the khasra number of the suit property was
corrected and similarly in the Rectification Deed executed in
favour of Sh. Om Parkash ... khasra number of the suit property was corrected to 248. The
execution of both Rectification Deeds by two previous owners
give credence to the claim
officials of CBSE advised the plaintiff no.1 to obtain order
Suit No.10524/16 Nb Sub. Pradeep Kumar Singh & Ors. vs. Chairman, CBSE ... time the mistake in the
certificate and take steps for immediate rectification. The
Suit No.10524/16 Nb Sub. Pradeep Kumar Singh
already
taken steps towards rectification of errors, if any, in the plaint of the subject
suit. Having duly considered the aforesaid submissions ... already taken
steps towards rectification of errors, if any, in the plaint of the subject suit, I
find that in the application filed
time, to plaintiff till disposal of the suit and
record of the plaintiff upon rectification of the share
transfer forms/resubmission of the share transfer ... court fee furnished /
Objections removed 20.07.1991
Suit refiled on 20.07.1991
16. The question is whether the suit be taken to have been filed
already taken steps towards rectification of errors, if any, in the plaint
of the subject suit. Having duly considered the aforesaid submissions ... already taken
steps towards rectification of errors, if any, in the plaint of the subject suit, I
find that in the application filed
time, to plaintiff till disposal
of the suit and record of the plaintiff upon rectification
of the share transfer forms/resubmission of the share
transfer
respondent no. 4 had sold the suit property vide sale
deed dated 01.05.2007 which was rectified vide rectification
deed dated 24.10.2007 and therefore, respondents ... sale
deed dated 01.05.2007 which was rectified vide rectification
deed dated 24.10.2007 is concerned, suit is within limitation as
it was instituted before
over the land
underneath the entire suit property and the terrace for which the
plaintiff has filed this suit. It is further argued that ... sale deed and rectification deed. She was given
opportunity to lead evidence. Therefore, it cannot be said that
present suit has been filed without disclosing
