2013 20:33:10 :::
kvm
4/32
ARBP638.13
redevelopment of the property and decided to demolish the garage and to construct
flats ... September, 2010 petitioner was accepted as a developer for
the purpose of redevelopment. The said resolution was unanimously approved by
all 29 members present
Regulations in respect of Slum Rehabilitation
Projects are also available to the Redevelopment under Regulation 33(5) of
the D.C. Regulations under which ... petitioners' redevelopment project
falls. The respondent no.1 has categorized certain areas in a building which
are not to be included in computation
first accord/offer a reasonable opportunity to the petitioners to
redevelop the said land in accordance with the law under the provisions
of Section ... Chapter IA of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance
and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 (for short "the Slum Act "). Some of the
relevant facts
Parineee Juhu Anamika Redevelopment ... vs Union Of India And 4 Ors on 24 February, 2022
Bench: R. D. Dhanuka , S. M. Modak ... CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L.) NO. 4907 OF 2022
Parinee GBMC Arunodaya Redevelopment Pvt. Ltd. ... Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Ors. ... Respondents
WITH
WRIT
since February 2013,
talks were being held by the society for the redevelopment of the society falling
under Sahakar Nagar-III. As far as back ... them approval as per Rule 33 (5) (2) (c) (2) for
joint redevelopment of the societies. It is submitted that the so called termination
letter
over the same to the plaintiff for
demolition and for carrying out redevelopment of the said property and to shift to the transit
accommodation ... WITH NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 1885.doc
floating tenders for the redevelopment of the suit property. The society issued an
advertisement in the local
possession of the
suit flats to the plaintiff for the purpose of redevelopment of the suit
property.
2. The plaintiff has filed the suit, inter ... Consultant for the proposed redevelopment project. On 3 rd January
2013, in the Special General Body Meeting of the society which was
also attended
decree against defendant nos. 2 to 72 to execute their consent for
redevelopment in favour of the plaintiffs in terms of the development
agreement ... society by which the society had agreed to enter
into agreement for redevelopment with the plaintiff was in respect of the act
touching the business
court under section 42 of the Maharashtra
Slum Area ( Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 as also
issue of limitation as jurisdictional issues under section ... section 42 of Maharashtra Slum As per Order
Area (Improvement, Clearance and
Redevelopment) Act, 1971 ?
2 Whether the suit is barred
year
2013, respondent No.1 approached the appellant with a proposal
for redevelopment of the said property under Regulation 33 (7) of
the Development Control
