moved no confidence motion against the deceased and this resulted in reelection in which again the deceased won the election and was installed as Pradhan
actually not maintainable and if it has been reelected, the order can be said to be just and proper.
8. This revision does not have
Committee of Management was held in which Mr. Gabriel Daud was again reelected as the Manager, the intimation of which was sent to the district
oral and documentary. The election dated 25.2.2010 which has been recognised merely reelected the previously elected manager i.e. respondent no. 3. Petitioner himself claims
held on 07 April, 2003, wherein the petitioner no. 2 was reelected.
15. It is stated that the respondent no. 3, on the basis
recount the ballot papers and declare any other person to have been reelected as Pradhan and to issue another certificate. We are, therefore
oral and documentary. The election dated 25.2.2010 which has been recognised merely reelected the previously elected manager i.e. respondent no. 3. Petitioner himself claims
from the date of assuming office and they will be eligible for reelection.
ii) An arrangement shall be made by the board to ensure than
allotment in favour of the Respondent No.7 be set aside and reelection/fresh allotment be ordered.
We have heard learned counsel for the petitioners ... done clandestinely and as such is liable to be set aside and reelection/re-allotment ordered. We are satisfied that the needful had been done
Afzal that petitioner was a Gram Pradhan from 2015-21 and is reelected as a Pradhan on 04.05.2021 and that a preliminary inquiry was initiated