Pramukh or Up-Pramukh so removed shall not be
eligible for reelection as Pramukh or Up-Pramukh of
Panchayat Samiti during the remaining term
information from the District Magistrate as
to whether these petitioners had been reelected for passing
appropriate orders under Section 475 of the Act read with
information from the District Magistrate as
to whether these petitioners had been reelected for passing
appropriate orders under Section 475 of the Act read with
information from the District Magistrate as
to whether these petitioners had been reelected for passing
appropriate orders under Section 475 of the Act read with
State
Election Commission vide notice dated 5.10.2013 fixing the date
of reelection of Pramukh on 18.10.2013, the same was sought to
be questioned by filing ... issuing notice was pleased to stay the operation of the notice of
reelection dated 5.10.2013 vide order passed on 8.10.2013. The
notice having been served
motion', the moment she
gets support of the majority for being reelected as the Chief
Councillor, a fresh tenure begins and any motion thereafter
that the Mukhiya, who was found to be involved, has not been
reelected. The other two persons, who are alleged to have
colluded with
confidence motion which was the reason for holding of the
reelection. The petitioner having taken the calculated risk to
contest the reelection of Up Mukhiya
paragraph 1 thereof, the State Election Authority has
decided to go for reelection for constituting a Managing
Committee in absence of there being sufficient nomination ... post of Chairman and
whether the State Election Authority can also hold reelection for
the said post or it would be contrary to the provisions
receipt and/or presentation of a
copy of this order.
The issue reelecting to alleged forged certificates are
question of fact to be decided