registered Partition Deed, in the form of Ex.A9, the question of varying the terms and conditions of such a Partition Deed would ... reasons infra. The partition deed is on a different footing than any other deed. In a partition deed, there is no transfer inter-vivos involved
life time of Jambulinga Mudaliar himself, after that Muchilikka, a registered partition deed(Ex.A2 dated 9.3.1994) emerged, except for item ... partition deed Ex.A2 even though it did not cover the II item of the suit property. The said partition deed
explained that partition means any partition made by execution of a deed of partition duly registered under the Registration Act, 1908 or partition effected ... purposes of this section partition means any partition made by execution of a deed of partition duly registered under the Registration
would contend that the said partition deed, Ex.A1 was not in stricto sensu, a partition deed, but only a family arrangement ... included in the partition deed, would not in any way affect the validity of the partition deed which emerged between the main co-parceners
other had no right in
S.No.56. There was a registered partition deed dated 22.02.1985 relating to
those properties and in that partition
deed dated 1.9.1946 would exemplify and demonstrate the factum of adoption and also the adoptive father having bequeathed his properties in the said deed ... namely, Krishnamurthy(the plaintiff) and Sundaravel, vide Ex.A20-the registered partition deed dated 24.2.1994, without taking any share for himself. However the suit
granting such other and further reliefs as this Honourable Court may deed fit and proper and circumstances of the case."
(extracted as such ... exposited from the plaint would run thus:
(i) There emerged a registered partition deed Ex.A1 dated 25.6.69 among the father of the plaintiff
explained that "partition" means any partition made by execution of a deed of partition duly registered under the Registration Act, 1908 or partition ... find out whether the partition has been effected before 20.12.2004 by deed of partition duly registered under the Registration Act, 1908 or by a decree
purpose of doing "DHARMA KAINGARYAM" as per the registered partition deed dated 16.06.1999 and for consequential injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with
plaintiff is not maintainable for one obvious reason. In the registered partition deed between this defendant, his brother and father, the A schedule properties were ... list of existing debts were also mentioned in the registered partition deed itself. Therefore, this defendant as well as the other parties to the partition
