floor and filed E.P. No. 57 of 1986 for regularisation of unauthorised construction, is totally false and the same is denied". According ... with the decree, the decree-holder is entitled for the regularisation of the construction and deviations cannot be accepted. The decree-holder herself averred
regularisation of unauthorised constructions. In pursuance of the said G.O., the 3rd respondent filed application for regularisation of unauthorised construction and the same ... applied to the 2nd respondent for regularisation of unauthorised construction of second and third floors and Permit No. 405/66 dated
Barkathpura, Hyderabad.
Sir,
Sub: MCH - T.P. Section -Regularisation of construction of stilt +3 Upper Floors ... Barkathpura, Hyderabad.
Sir,
Sub: MCH - T.P.S. - Regularisation of
construction of stilt + 3 Upper Floors
that Chapter XII of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act provides for regularisation of construction/ erection of buildings, notices regarding erection of buildings etc. Various provisions ... material produced before them with regard to date of construction/completion of construction etc., and whether they are satisfying the requirements as contemplated under
requested for regularisation of un-authorised construction as per the said G.O. But no decision is taken by the respondent-Municipality in view ... after demolishing the existing old house, as his application for regularisation of the construction is stated to be pending
consideration with the respondent-Municipality
Corporation Act and was of the view that it provides for regularisation of construction/erection of buildings etc. He referred to Sections
this GO the respondents cannot even file an application seeking regularisation of the illegal construction after September, 1987.
33. Now the question ... approved plan. Further after September, 1987, no application for regularisation of any illegal construction can even be entertained. Keeping the totality of the circumstances
construction of the apartments and the same has constituted a deficiency in service since the petitioner has failed to complete the construction and handover ... contract. The mere fact that the opposite party applied for regularisation of unauthorised construction does not absolve him of his responsibility of handing over
justify an action for demolition after eight years of the completion of construction. Accordingly, he decreed the suit and restrained the defendant and its officers ... including G.O.Ms. No. 419, MA, dated 30-7-1998 for regularisation of such constructions. The validity of that G.O. was challenged
objection at the time of construction, though they are neighbours, and
having allowed to proceed with the construction later started
threatening to cause demolish ... twin requirements of whether the construction without valid
sanction and non-violated of so-called regularisation can be just to
order demolition
