services were regularised by the impugned order dated 3.3.2000. Thus the respondents kept regularising the services who were junior to the applicant while denying regularisation ... Different reasons were given for non-regularisation of his services, such as there being no provision for regularisation of part time worker, sanction
labourers since many years and have approached this Tribunal for regularisation of their services, since they apprehend termination, they are seeking direction to respondents ... respondents not to terminate the services of applicants as long as there is sufficient work. In case the services of applicants are to be terminated
30th of the pay in the
relevant minimum scale and/or regularisation of
services since they are not in service of the
Government of India ... with
the concurrence of the Ministry of Finance.
x) The regularisation of the services of the
casual workers will continue to be governed
Kodarbhai Gandhi vs Canteen Stores Department on 12 December, 2019
1 OA Nos.642 of
Krishna Budukale vs Canteen Stores Department on 12 December, 2019
1 OA Nos.642 of
Jayram Kondiram Jadhav vs Canteen Stores Department on 12 December, 2019
1 OA Nos.642
Ajay Kumar Saxena vs Canteen Stores Department on 12 December, 2019
1 OA Nos.642
Dyandev Ramchandra Kamble vs Canteen Stores Department on 12 December, 2019
1 OA Nos.642
Pendyala Shobha vs Canteen Stores Department on 12 December, 2019
1 OA Nos.642 of
Suryakant Ghag vs Canteen Stores Department on 12 December, 2019
1 OA Nos.642 of
