Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 597 (0.92 seconds)

Salahudeen Babu vs P.T.Prabhakar on 31 January, 2005

vide paragraph-25): - " Though the municipal laws permit deviations from sanctioned constructions being regularised by compounding but that is by way of exception. Unfortunately ... commencement of the 1998 Amendment Act can be regularised/rectified. Even in respect of unauthorised constructions/deviations made prior to the 1998 Amendment Act, only
Madras High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 12 - Full Document

Kokila Kaliamoorthy vs K.Mani on 15 December, 2009

deceased first defendant had made any deviation, the second defendant has the required authority to regularise the unauthorised construction. Referring to the MMDA Rules ... written statement that the 6th defendant has the authority to regularise any deviation made in construction of the buildings in accordance with the rules
Madras High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

J.Ayesha Begam vs The Member Secretary on 23 November, 2017

para 25 as follows: ?Though the municipal Laws permit deviations from sanctioned constructions being regularised by compounding but that is by way of exception. Unfortunately ... have carried out construction activities in anticipation that such violations/deviations might be regularised. If admittedly the constructions are not in terms of the rules
Madras High Court Cites 42 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next