municipal commissioner was devoid of any power to
regularise deviation/unauthorised constructions but
subsequently 2015 Rules have been framed empowering
the municipal commissioner to pass
come to a finding whether the said deviations may
be considered as minor deviations and regularised. While doing so, the
Chairman is at liberty ... other deviation that may
come to his notice require to be demolished or the said deviations may be
treated as minor and regularised. The entire
instant
suit is that the Corporation Commissioner
should be restrained from regularising these
deviations. Such a relief is wholly unthinkable.
Certain amount of discretion vests
instant suit is
that the Corporation Commissioner should be
restrained from regularising these deviations. Such
a relief is wholly unthinkable. Certain amount of
discretion vests
instant
suit is that the Corporation Commissioner
should be restrained from regularising these
deviations. Such a relief is wholly unthinkable.
Certain amount of discretion vests
instant suit is that
the Corporation Commissioner should be restrained
from regularising these deviations. Such a relief is
wholly unthinkable. Certain amount of discretion vests
regularization is pending. If the
application regularization is allowed and deviations are regularised, the
petitioner, who may get the benefit will not have the building
demolition notice, granting three months time to the respondent to
regularise the deviations and obtain approval for the existing building put
up. The said order
demolition notice, granting three months time to the respondent to
regularise the deviations and obtain approval for the existing building put
up. The said order
demolition notice, granting three months time to the respondent to
regularise the deviations and obtain approval for the existing building
put up. The said order
