regularly appointed and to provide them the regular pay-scale from the date of their initial appointment considering the nature of appointment as permanent.
Learned ... appointment and, thus, are admissible to the service benefits of a regular/permanent employee. As such the payment of fixed salary to the petitioners
basic concept of giving incentive and reward to a permanent and responsible regular employee.
30.We are not impressed by the aforesaid submissions. The appointment ... spells of temporary or temporary and permanent service is legal and proper. We find that once regularization had been made on vacant posts, though
fact that in earlier proceedings between the parties pertaining to permanent injunction, regular suit bearing No. 1364 of 2012 filed by the present plaintiffs
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that he had initially filed regular suit for permanent injunction registered as regular suit No.715 of 2019 in which
filed seeking a direction to the court concerned to decide regular suit for permanent injunction filed against the petitioner in specified time frame.
Learned counsel ... submits that the petitioner is defendant in the regular suit no.73 of 2016 filed for permanent injunction in which as yet evidence of plaintiff
mother, namely, Smt. Saroj Rani had filed Regular Suit No.1097/2007 seeking permanent injunction against defendants/ opposite parties no.2 and 3. However, despite
filed challenging order dated 18th January 2023 passed by Civil Judge in regular suit No. 719 of 2000 whereby application filed by petitioners for framing ... opposite parties had filed the aforesaid suit for permanent and mandatory injunction which was registered as regular suit No. 719 of 2000 and was decreed
application for temporary injunction filed by petitioners in regular suit No. 175 of 2022 for permanent injunction and cancellation of sale deed.
Learned counsel ... directed to consider and decide application for temporary injunction filed in regular suit No. 175 of 2022 (Jahid ali and others versus Jakir Nisha
court concerned to decide the regular suit No. 232 of 2012 for partition and permanent exemption.
It appears that due to efflux of time ... efficacy. However Civil Judge, Senior Division, Mohanlalganj, Lucknow is directed to decide regular suit No. 232 of 2012 expeditiously without granting undue adjournment to either
question, the petitioner was compelled to file the Regular Suit No.81 of 2022 for permanent injunction in which initially an ex parte interim injunction
