Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 416 (1.97 seconds)

Saurashtra Shramik Sangh & 2 vs Savarkundala Municipality & on 9 September, 2016

regularly   and   more   than   240   days.     With   such  allegation,   the   claimants   demanded   that   their  services should be regularized and they should be  treated   permanent   employees ... duties   and  functions   performed   by   other   workmen   who   are  considered regular/permanent workmen in the same  cadre/category   where   the   claimants   are   working.  The   area
Gujarat High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - K M Thaker - Full Document

Sant Ram And Others vs High Court Of Himachal Pradesh on 6 May, 2016

Article 226 of the Constitution will not issue directions for regularization, absorption or permanent continuance, unless the employees claiming regularization had been appointed in pursuance ... seek regularization as they are not working against any sanctioned posts. There cannot be a direction for absorption, regularization or permanent continuance of part time
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 33 - Cited by 50 - Full Document

Prajapati Hitesh Mohanlal & 15 vs State Of Gujarat & 2 on 1 July, 2016

month   of  April   2011   which   was   admittedly   not   on  permanent   basis,   nor   on   regular   establishment  with prescribed pay scale, but on temporary and  Page ... learned advocates appearing for the respective   petitioners deal with permanent establishments  where   on   permanent   posts   carrying   prescribed  pay   scale,   persons   were   appointed
Gujarat High Court Cites 53 - Cited by 30 - S G Gokani - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next