regularized and get regular pay.
In paragraph 45 this Court observed :
"While directing that appointments, temporary or
casual, be regularized or made permanent ... nature by insisting on regularization
or permanence in employment, when those employed
temporarily are not needed permanently or regularly? As
an example, we can envisage
already been regularized, could not have asked for
regularization for the second time.
Once a person is appointed on a regular basis, he can only ... reasons. Firstly, the words "regular" or
"regularization" do not connote permanence. They
are terms calculated to condone any procedural
irregularities
hold
any posts to claim even any comparison with
the regular and permanent staff for any or all
purposes including a claim for equal ... hold any
posts to claim even any comparison with the
regular and permanent staff for any or all purposes
including a claim for equal
validated by taking
recourse to regularization. For the purpose of regularization which would
confer on the concerned employee a permanent status, there must exist ... held to hold any posts to claim even
comparison with the regular and permanent staff for any
or all purposes including a claim for equal
regular recruitment.
The direction to make permanent -- the distinction
between regularization and making permanent, was
not emphasized here -- can only encourage the
State, the model ... court clearly held that
the words "regular" or "regularization" do not
connote permanence and cannot be construed so as
to convey
Constitution of India,
should not ordinarily issue directions for absorption,
regularization, or permanent continuance unless the
recruitment itself was made regularly and in terms ... further by-passing of the constitutional
requirement and regularizing or making permanent, those
not duly appointed as per the constitutional scheme."
The original appointment
appointment, he
would not be entitled to be absorbed in regular
service or made permanent, merely on the strength
of such continuance, if the original ... thereafter he filed writ
petition before the High Court for regularization
on permanent basis with all consequential benefits.
The High Court directed the State
validated by
taking recourse to regularization. For the purpose of
regularization which would confer on the concerned
employee a permanent status, there must exist ... pensionable establishment, temporary or permanent who were
in service. Thus, whether temporary or permanent, the employee must be
regular employee which would mean employee appointed
nature of his work is
rightly entitled to be made permanent and
regularized in the post of Clerk/ typist keeping in
view the nature ... Shiv Dutt,
post Clerk having not declared the concerned
worker as regularized and permanent is an
illegality and is wrong. Thus, it is my decision
reasons. Firstly, the words "regular" or "regularization" do not connote permanence. They are terms calculated to condone any procedural irregularities ... only regularizing the appointment and no more and that regularization would not mean that the appointment would have to be considered to be permanent
