Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 404 (1.57 seconds)

M Vijay Kumar vs D/O Post on 30 October, 2018

respondents instead of considering them for regularization, only to deny the rightful claim of the applicant for regularization and for considering them for appointment ... applicants are just outsiders who are being engaged in leave / regular vacancies in GDS MM / MTS cadre in RMS 'Y' Division
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

K Sarada Rao vs M/O Railways on 9 December, 2020

retiree. It is not under dispute that the applicant was on Extraordinary Leave (EOL) without pay from 7.4.2002 to 22.6.2006. EOL without ... leave granted to a Railway servant, who fails to comply with the conditions on which study leave was granted to him, is converted into regular
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pushpa Kale vs M/O Railways on 20 August, 2018

neither covered by a regular Medical certificate issued by the Railway Doctor in form ( M8 & M9) nor covered by leave sanctioned by the competent ... confirm that the late railway servant has neither applied for leave nor got it regularized after availing of the leave. The muster roll reinforces
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

T Munikrishnaiah vs M/O Railways on 12 February, 2024

ordered that the intervening period from 22.04.2010 to 04.07.2011 may be regularized as leave due to him as per his leave credit. Thus, the respondents ... from 22.04.2010 till 04.07.2011 and the said period has been regularized against the leave due in accordance with Clause (ii) of Rule 1344 (2) read
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

S V Ramana vs M/O Railways on 5 April, 2024

period, he had remained unauthorized absence for 70 days but leave was granted for 14 days and sick on Private Medical Certificate for 54 days ... leave by competent authority, it would remain unauthorized absence. In the present case, the period of absence was not sanctioned as leave or regularized
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Zahidunnisa vs Post Ap Circle on 23 December, 2022

Circle, CPMG Building, Vijayawada granting provisional pension instead of regular pension, gratuity, leave encashment, commutation ... other retiral benefits is illegal and direct the respondents to release regular pension, leave encashment, gratuity, commutation and other retiral benefits from the date
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

A M Sirish vs M/O External Affairs on 14 August, 2018

High Court, Hyderabad. The period of unauthorized absence was not regularized by the department. Even though the applicant made an application by merely counting ... unauthorized absence of the applicant, it is necessary to regularize his leave. period to enable him to take voluntary retirement under CCS (Pension) Rules
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next