supra) case, Regulations 8.7 and
8.8 were incorporated in the 2002 Regulations in March, 2004.
Regulations 8.7 and 8.8 were challenged ... effect that Clause 8.8
cannot be held to be invalid on the ground of being beyond the
Regulation framing power
returning the Appeal dated 18-03-2021 filed by petitioner under
Regulation 8.8 of the Indian Medical Council (Professional
Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations
Trial Judge in the
said writ petition that the Rule 8.8 of the Regulation of 2002 is unconstitutional.
The fact leading to preferring the aforesaid ... Supreme Court. We stay
permanently the operpation of the aforesaid regulation (8.8) for this case only.
As far as enhance of punishment is concerned
Abhijat, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
referred to Regulation 8.8 of the Indian Medical Council (Professional
Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002 (hereafter ... constituted for consideration of the
complaints relating to professional misconduct. Regulation 8 .7 and 8.8
of the 2002 Regulations are relevant
with
the contention urged by the appellant that an appeal under
Regulation 8.8 of the 2002 Regulations does not lie. It is
further submitted that ... Judge has rightly
appreciated that MCI did not invoke the powers under
Regulation 8.7 and therefore in the facts and
circumstances of the case ought
The Tata Power Company Limited vs Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory ... on 28 November, 2013
Appeal No104
which is not listed/ categorized under regulation 7.
12.1 Regulation 8 .1, when read alongwith regulation 8.2 and 8.8, would show
that under regulation ... titled as an
appeal under the provisions of regulation 8.2 read with regulation 8.8 of the
MCI Regulations, that by itself, would not take away
complaint
in the office of the Medical Council of India.
8.8 Any person aggrieved by the decision of the State
Medical Council on any complaint ... ignored and by the expert bodies invested with the
power under Regulation 2002 to maintain professional conduct,
Etiquette and Ethics have recorded casual or general
provisions
of Section 26 of the 1914 Act and Clause 8.8 of the 2002
Regulation. On this point, the petitioner's submission is that ... Supreme Court. We stay permanently the operation of the
aforesaid regulation (8.8) for this case only."
30. The appellate jurisdiction of the MCI under
(Biswajit Hazra vs Medical Council Of India & Ors.) on 23 July, 2014
Author: Dipankar
