issued the order dated
06.06.2015 to respondent no.4 for rehearing the matter before its
council and pass appropriate order in the light ... vide
letter dated 01.06.2015 to give an opportunity to the supplier to
rehear and review the case, and accordingly respondent Sukarta
Parishad/Facilitation Council passed
further
to admit the same to its file and to rehear the appeal on merits.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai ... further
to admit the same to its file and to rehear the appeal on merits.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai
issued the order dated
06.06.2015 to respondent no.4 for rehearing the matter before its
council and pass appropriate order in the light ... vide
letter dated 01.06.2015 to give an opportunity to the supplier to
rehear and review the case, and accordingly respondent Sukarta
Parishad/Facilitation Council passed
purposes of this lis,
permit the defendant to press for a rehearing
“on account of some mistake or error apparent
on the face ... which two conclusions are not possible.
Neither of them postulate a rehearing of the
dispute because a party had not highlighted
all the aspects
purposes of this lis, permit the
defendant to press for a rehearing "on account of some mistake or
error apparent on the face ... which two conclusions are not possible. Neither of them
postulate a rehearing of the dispute because a party had not
highlighted all the aspects
purposes of this lis, permit
the defendant to press for a rehearing "on account of some
mistake or error apparent on the face ... which two conclusions
are not possible. Neither of them postulate a rehearing of the
dispute because a party had not highlighted all the aspects
Appellate Authority both on fact and in law and almost
tantamounts to rehearing of the entire facts, the order cannot be set
aside as being ... appeal is to be in the nature of a rehearing--a
technical expression which does little more than entitle
teh committee to review the facts
purposes of this lis, permit
the defendant to press for a rehearing "on account of some mistake
or error apparent on the face ... which two conclusions are not possible. Neither of
them postulate a rehearing of the dispute because a party had not
highlighted all the aspects
purposes of this lis, permit the
defendant to press for a rehearing "on account of some mistake or
error apparent on the face ... which two conclusions are not possible. Neither of them
postulate a rehearing of the dispute because a party had not
highlighted all the aspects
purposes of this lis, permit the defendant to press
for a rehearing "on account of some mistake or error
apparent on the face ... which two conclusions are not possible. Neither of
them postulate a rehearing of the dispute because a
R.P. No.948/2019 3
party
