alleged that the accused persons created a forged
and fabricated Release Deed dated 05.02.1992, as if the defacto
complainant is relinquishing his rights ... following submissions :-
a. The crux of the allegation is that the
Release Deed dated 05.02.1992 is a forged and fabricated
http://www.judis
alleged that his mother had released
her right in the said properties by a sham and nominal release deed dated
02.06.1974, and that ... explain how the suit is
maintainable in the face of the release deed. It was represented and again
returned on 07.03.2014 by the Learned District
voluntarily released her share in favour of defendant No.1
and 7. It is further alleged that the said release deed was duly registered ... presence of witnesses. She put her thumb impressions on the
release deed in presence of the deponent and the witnesses. The
witnesses also signed
1108
dated 03.08.2005, (hereinafter referred to as the "registered
released deed") in favour of the plaintiffs (who are his real
grand sons ... defendant No.2 is still alive and never
challenged the release deed till date), on false and fictitious
grounds, instituted a civil suit
held to be self-acquired property of Muthusamy Gounder, would the Release Deed, relied upon by the defendants to exclude the plaintiff from the line ... ground, that the Appellants have released their right in the suit properties under Ex.B6 Release Deed, whereas the suspicion surrounding the execution
found that the plaintiff has
no locustandi to object to the release deed obtained by the defendants from
the co-owner of the plaintiff ... Since Exhibits B3 and B12 sale deeds are based upon forged
power deeds, these two sale deeds will not confer any title upon the second
pursuant to the Panchayatars' decision, the first defendant executed a release deed dated 24.05.1974 in favour of the first plaintiff by receiving ... suit property and since the execution of the said release deed, it is only the first plaintiff, who has got absolute title, possession and enjoyment
plaintiff herself had
released her share by receiving Rs.60,000/- from her father and executed a
release deed ... dated 22.02.1998, and the said plea of release having not been
established by producing the alleged release deed dated 21.02.1998, to non-suit
the plaintiff
order to grab the share of the plaintiff, got
release deed dated 26.02.2002 executed from defendant No.2
and mutation No.670 dated ... also got sanctioned
in connivance with officials of the revenue department. Release
deed and mutation got executed by defendant No.1 were in
respect
release of a coparcener's interest in the joint property and however such release cannot be construed to be one as release deed. According ... concluded that the deed could be termed as partition deed as well. In the said circumstances, merely holding the deed as release deed, despite
