favour of his sons i.e. the present appellants
vide release deed dated 25.8.2003.
In view of the stand of defendant No.1, the plaintiff ... said to be without legal necessity. It was also held
that release deed has been executed in favour of defendant
decree passed by the first Appellate Court, whereby the
registered release deed executed by Suba in favour of the said defendant on
25.1.2002 was found ... Prithi filed the present suit for
declaration challenging the release deed dated 25.1.2002 propounded by the
defendant-appellant on 31.1.2002. The suit was dismissed
they produced DW-1 Balbir Singh, Deed
writer who proved the release deed Ex.D1 dated 25.2.2003 and DW-2
Mahas Singh, Numberdar ... taken her
life. He deposed that his grandfather had executed the release deed in favour
of his uncles but did not give any land
namely Harjas Kumar and Jai Singh respectively, vide
released deed dated 05.07.2004, which was approved on 08.08.2004. It is
VIMAL KUMAR ... mandatory for the
release of the land. Therefore, the decision of the State Government to release
the land from acquisition through communication dated 27.12.2005 does
Chunilal Sowcar. He had, on his own volition, execution the registered release deed (Exhibit B-15) in favour of Chunila Sowcar regarding the property ... Chunilal Sowear. Non-production and even non-mentioning of the release deed at the trial tantamount to playing fraud on the court
towards deficient stamp duty on the release deed dated 13.6.2000 was decreed.
Both the Courts have decreed the suit on the ground that under
Section
writ petition is for issuance of
direction to respondents to release the title deeds of her property and that of her
husband deposited ... allowed with a direction
to the respondent-Bank to release the title deed of ownership of the petitioner
forthwith.
However, the writ petition claiming release
family shifted to India. The plaintiff Sarup
Singh, executed a relinquishment deed agreeing to give up all rights in
the family property including right ... Singh. It was also
pleaded that plaintiff Sarup Singh has executed release deed, thus, he
was debarred from filing the suit. It was also pleaded
acres of land in favour of his mother vide release deed
dated 08.05.2007 and that such transaction is camouflage. Learned trial
Court determined
learned Courts below whereby the suit
seeking declaration that release deed dated 18.07.2001 is ineffective qua the
rights of the present appellant, was dismissed
