1108
dated 03.08.2005, (hereinafter referred to as the "registered
released deed") in favour of the plaintiffs (who are his real
grand sons ... defendant No.2 is still alive and never
challenged the release deed till date), on false and fictitious
grounds, instituted a civil suit
order to grab the share of the plaintiff, got
release deed dated 26.02.2002 executed from defendant No.2
and mutation No.670 dated ... also got sanctioned
in connivance with officials of the revenue department. Release
deed and mutation got executed by defendant No.1 were in
respect
defendant by playing
fraud upon Smt. Chhano managed to procure the release deed bearing No.
5036 dated 20.2.2007 and got sanctioned mutation ... upon rights of the
appellants as Smt. Chhano never executed the release deed in favour of the
respondent nor appeared before the petition writer
Courts whereby suit filed by the
appellant to challenge the release deed dated 06.09.2007 qua share of the
plaintiff/appellant and mutation sanctioned thereof ... Additional District Judge, Karnal.
The appellant/plaintiff has challenged the release deed on the
premise that land measuring 7 kanal 15 marlas out of land
agreement to sell dated 18.04.2009 while setting aside the Release Deed
Ex.DW5/A executed by defendant No.1 in favour of defendant ... realizing that defendant No.1 had executed a Release Deed No.145 dated
1.5.2009 in favour of defendant Nos.3 to 6, the same
aforesaid registered sale deed and hence
supplementary deed was executed by Prem on 11.12.1981 acknowledging
the first sale deed and giving details of corrected khasra ... sons i.e. defendant Nos.2 to 6 by release deed dated
03.01.2003 and defendant Nos.2 to 6 further mortgaged the property in
favour
appellant-plaintiff filed suit seeking
declaration to the effect that release deed No.28 dated 06.04.2012 and
subsequent mutation No.1963 dated ... been stated by
Beer Sen that he executed a release deed dated 6.4.2012
in favour of Sant Ram which is correct. He has admitted
this
Mukesh Kumar for
permanent injunction to the effect that registered relinquishment/release
deed bearing No.1108 dated 03.08.2005 executed in favour of defendants ... 2884 of 2018 -3-
plaintiff never executed the aforemention ed release deed. It is further
stated that the defendants bein g strong, mischievous and greedy
declaration
with consequential relief of permanent injunction by challenging the
release deed dated 20.2.2003/24.2.2003 registered on 28.2.2003 was
dismissed by the trial ... plaintiff's thumb impression on blank paper, prepared a release deed
and got the same registered by getting two fake witnesses namely Suresh
plaintiffs instituted the suit for permanent and
mandatory injunction challenging the release deed dated 28.01.2005
executed by Pyara Singh in favour of defendants ... alienate
the property except for legal necessity. The witness of the release deed was
one Kanwar Singh who was not resident of the village that
