favour of the Plaintiff
and against the Defendants thereby declaring the Release
Deed dated 19.12.2014registered at the office of the Sub
Registrar ... being based on the void Sale Deed dated 20.10.2014 and
void Release Deed dated 19.12.2014 and consequently not
binding on the Plaintiff and not affecting
effect that JD had released his share in favour
of objector vide release deed dated 10-9-2004 which is Ex. OW1/2.
This ... once the conveyance deed
is executed and property become free hold. There is no condition in
the conveyance deed that release or transfer
premises in favour of the petitioner
Shri Mohammad Muzammil vide Release Deed dated 18.07.2022,
duly registered with the office of Sub Registrar. It has been ... averred that immediately after the execution and registration of the
said Release Deed, the petitioner apprised the respondent about the
said Release Deed and asked
premises in favour of the petitioner
Shri Mohammad Muzammil vide Release Deed dated 18.07.2022,
duly registered with the office of Sub Registrar. It has been ... averred that immediately after the execution and registration of the
said Release Deed, the petitioner apprised the respondent about the
said Release Deed and asked
premises in favour of the petitioner
Shri Mohammad Muzammil vide Release Deed dated 18.07.2022,
duly registered with the office of Sub Registrar. It has been ... averred that immediately after the execution and registration of the
said Release Deed, the petitioner apprised the respondent about the
said Release Deed and asked
Urmila released her 1/7th undivided share in the suit property
in favour of the plaintiff by way of a registered release deed dated ... Singhal also released her 1/7th
undivided share in favour of the plaintiff and defendants by way of a
registered release deed, duly registered
joint affidavit / deed of sale
agreement / possession letter. The plaintiff has not proved any
registered relinquishment deed, registered release deed, or registered
conveyance deed executed ... operative conveyance deed creating title in favour of
the plaintiff in the same manner as a registered sale deed or
registered release deed would. Therefore
suit
for partition of property without disclosing the fact of said
release deed. The court held that the preliminary decree
KIRAN Digitally signed by
KIRAN
petitioner did not supply
legible copies of the relinquishment deed, which recites release of a
property shown in the plan in orange colour ... further alleged that the petitioner has not filed the
title deeds of his predecessor in interest, Sh. Din Dayal and the
relinquishment deed being
Subrata Chakraborty vs Sharmistha Gupta on 24 April, 2026
IN THE COURT OF SUMIT DALAL
